Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Will DJ Moore be back next year?


crowntownpanther

Recommended Posts

No doubt we need him, but of all players who would make sense to trade, he would have to be near the top of the list.  He would attract offers, and with RA playing well and Curtis developing nicely, an argument could be made that he would bring in enough of a return to warrant a trade. 

For what it's worth, I personally want to keep him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a very interesting topic and appreciate you for making a thread that doesn't include "QB" in the title haha. In all seriousness, I'm in the same boat as you, I want to keep him. It really comes down to if he's going to be asking for WR1 type money, if so I think it's smart to package him for draft capital or an established lineman and then resign curtco and draft a later mid round WR. Side note - I still have high hopes for a name that might have been forgotten which would be Omar Bayless, he was balling out and even getting high praise from Rhule before his injury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I made a post during the offseason of Funchess' last year with us and argued we should get value from him now and make a trade. I was made fun of. We missed a chance on that one. DJ I'd love to keep, but having three WRs eating up a large chunk of the salary cap is not viable imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm gonna say yes, but if we have to trade up for a QB, he could be part of the package.

I think it would be a mistake to trade him though. He's our most talented WR and he's only 23.

The mere idea Hurney trading up for a QB and DJ being included makes me nauseous

Link to comment
Share on other sites

whelp, we could get a second or maybe even a later first.  he's that good, even with his second contract looming and knowing what his position make these days.  One thing in our advantage....lots of flashy WRs come out every year....the question is, will they bust?  will they play to their potential and then become a diva/pain in the ass distraction?  He's prove to be very good on and off the field, quiet performer who has succeeded despite horrible QB play and play calling.

He's got value.   I like him a lot better than Curtis, but Curtis will be cheaper to sign, and I like Robby as WR 1.  I don't see a way we can pay DJ and extend Robby after next year.

And we could use an extra top 50 pick in a big way.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When you make a player your first round pick. You are saying he's apart of your future.  He has done nothing wrong to not continue to believe he's part of the future.  It makes no sense to trade a former 1st rounder and another first rounder for a QB unless you're talking about the only two franchise QBs in this draft.  And to be honest the cost is going higher than Moore and our #1 pick in 2021.

I personally would be upset because he's is a talented WR and can win contested balls.    Moore, Samuel and Anderson are the best trio in the NFL.  How long Anderson will be here is unknown.  You lose Anderson in a year or two in Free Agency and the next thing you know our #1 WR is Samuel.

So no, I am 100% against trading Moore. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at recent seasons of TB, ARI, CLE, SEA, MIN, DAL, BUF, LAR, KC ... I think the league is turning into 3 receiving threats plus a back who can catch passes. Money is being spent on offense for these franchises. I believe in Rhule/Brady system, the purpose is to have as many weapons on the field at once.

 

that’s being said, I don’t see us trading Moore. He is cheap talent right now, for at least another 2 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Malcom Spence is the best player remaining, hope he’s there.
    • The era that you played in, and, more importantly, who you played with actually matters. Honestly, that's why these issues will be debated forever, as it's just difficult to say that this person or that person is better when you're discussing the passage of time. As for me, after Rice, Moss and maybe Megatron and T.O., there's probably a dozen or so guys that can be argued about to the cows come home. Personally, I'm not putting Fitz, Harrison, Johnson, Evans, or especially D-Hop, Jefferson, Chase or Hill definitely in front of Smitty (and Colston ain't even in the discussion). Context and all that stuff actually matters. Things like the triple crown matter. 
    • Some of those guys? Yeah honestly you can.  I would 100% take Steve Smith over Larry Fitzgerald, Harrison, even Mike Evans. He is 100% a better player than those guys in his prime. If you look at the numbers Smith is historically under targeted in comparison to his contemporaries. He was only targeted 150 times or more only once in his career. Fitzgerald for example was targeted well above that 9 different seasons. Had Smith played with Peyton, Brady, Greatest Show on Turf, or even with Warner in Arizona he would broken records. His 2008 season was ridiculous accumulating 1400 yards in 13 games on less than 80 receptions. All time he also lost a season due to injury in 04, barely played WR as a rookie. Got robbed of 1k season with Clausen. Thats easily another 1800yds minimum that should have been tacked on to his #s. The only guys I’d say for certain are better than Smith are Rice, Moss, TO, Megatron, Julio Jones, Antonio Brown.
×
×
  • Create New...