Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

3 QBs in the top 4?


AU-panther

Recommended Posts

With the top 5 set in the draft order it really looks like the top 3 QBs could go in the top 4.

Jags draft Trevor 

Jets - I guess they could build around Darnold but I just don't see it.  You don't tank that hard to not take a QB.  Wilson the favorite?

Miami - I could see them going with a non-QB.  Sewell or Chase.  Could even trade down. Outside chance they could take another QB.

Atlanta - If Fields is there I can't see how they pass.  I guess they could try to win now with Ryan but how often do you get a chance to draft a QB like that.  Seems too perfect for them.

At this point I'm worried we might have to trade up some to take Lance.  

Jones and/or Trask might be more in play than a lot of thought going into this.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, t96 said:

If Jets pass on Fields and Dolphins want to stick with Tua, I’m definitely trading up to 3 for Fields, don’t even care what it takes to give up.

Not sure if the Dolphins budge from 3 if Sewell is in their lap.

Would be a lot like Washington last year with Chase Young

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, t96 said:

If Jets pass on Fields and Dolphins want to stick with Tua, I’m definitely trading up to 3 for Fields, don’t even care what it takes to give up.

This. We are in a great spot to trade up without it crippling us for years to come. If you have a guy you like, that you feel can be your franchise QB for years to come, you absolutely go for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

With the top 5 set in the draft order it really looks like the top 3 QBs could go in the top 4.

Jags draft Trevor 

Jets - I guess they could build around Darnold but I just don't see it.  You don't tank that hard to not take a QB.  Wilson the favorite?

Miami - I could see them going with a non-QB.  Sewell or Chase.  Could even trade down. Outside chance they could take another QB.

Atlanta - If Fields is there I can't see how they pass.  I guess they could try to win now with Ryan but how often do you get a chance to draft a QB like that.  Seems too perfect for them.

At this point I'm worried we might have to trade up some to take Lance.  

Jones and/or Trask might be more in play than a lot of thought going into this.

 

 

 

Atl doesn't pass on Fields. Even though they still have Ryan, the writing is on the wall for him. His time is coming to an end. They will set up for the next 10 years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, WarPanthers89 said:

This. We are in a great spot to trade up without it crippling us for years to come. If you have a guy you like, that you feel can be your franchise QB for years to come, you absolutely go for it.

Oh yea? Tell me the last time a trade like that worked out in favor of the team trading up? Look at recent drafts and all the "franchise Qbs" that are currently playing only a few of them were drafted in the top 10. You don't need to mortgage the future to find your Qb if anything it hurts you more than it helps.

"The teams that have a quarterback picked in the Top 5 on their roster (the Browns, Dolphins, Bengals, Jets, Rams, Cardinals, Bears, Lions, Eagles, Pats, and Falcons) have a combined record of 67-87-2 this season."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • Taking only players from the sheet that are realistically available in or after the listed round, I’d like… 1st: DT Caleb Banks (Styles not realistic) 2nd: LB Jacob Rodriguez 3rd: OT Best available from Bowry, Barber, and Casey 4th: CB Daylen Everette 5th: S Jalen Huskey 6th: RB Adam Randall 7th: IOL Best available from Lemieux, Dawkins, Leausa, and Brose   I know nothing about some of the players listed, but it seems like that would be the best way it could fall for now. I’m sure the list of who we meet will change a ton, and there will also be players we don’t meet with to keep quiet. I’d love to pick up Randall in the late rounds. 
    • Not what I said. They know within the building why we aren't utilizing TEs more. If the rumors were true that we were seriously pursuing a couple of decent receiving TEs that strongly points toward a lack of quality receiving TEs currently on the roster. Does that mean we consider drafting one at 19? I don't know, but it wouldn't shock me and if we did there's only one guy it would be. I wouldn't be surprised at all to see TE drafting somewhere in the first three rounds. 
    • Yeah, I don’t know. Tepper was behind the Bryce selection. Behind firings and hiring over his lack of development.  He doesn’t have to literally tell them their hands are tied for them to know this. It is in the air constantly. The Canales Bryce play calling was even portrayed by more than one person as Canales failing Bryce, instead of Bryce being responsible for his own performance (except when he does well, then it is all him). Now they have an extra coach in, to help the new OC get results from this QB.  The atmosphere is not welcoming to prototypical young QBs that have talent. You get Jake Plummer types or old vets. I think we are stuck. 
×
×
  • Create New...