Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hypothetical Trade for Deshaun Watson


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Nope. He wants out. They can take Ted, our 1st and next years 2nd. They can draft a new QB with that pick and do what we should do at that price.

I don't see it happening. Maybe if it goes terrible for them and us, we see him next offseason. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a heart beat. One of the positives that we have going is that we are still rebuilding and there is a good chance that the 2022 1st could still be top 15 as opposed to Pitt, NE, San Fran, or New Orleans which would all be pick 24 on up.

I would hope the Texans find that spicer than the other hypothetical spots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's another hypothetical:

PANTHERS GET:

Patrick Mahomes

CHIEFS GET:

Teddy Bridgewater, 2021 No. 8 overall pick, 2021 second-round pick, 2021 third-round pick, 2022 first-round pick, 2022 second-round pick, 2023 third-round pick

 

 

Both "hypotheticals" are equally likely of happening

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...