I'm not sure if he is significant enough to say no to Pitts, but I'm assuming he didn't take the job without assurances he wouldn't be tossed to the side. It could give minimum insight into the Bengals thinking tackle at 5. What say you?
And half this boards opinion would amount to zero in the grand scheme of things. Critical people are going to do what they do best and that is bitch, piss and moan until they find a new target to criticize.