Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Take my money!!!!!!


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

Do we really want to be paying 40 Million for a QB when we can get a rookie on a rookie deal?

Well, you have proven elite player at the NFL level and you have, "Gosh, I hope he becomes a proven elite player at the NFL level."

Then it just becomes about what that vision for the future of the franchise is and how to achieve it. We have no idea whether the franchise wants to make that kind of a bold move or gamble on a rookie. TBQH, it's possible we choose neither for this offseason. 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

Do we really want to be paying 40 Million for a QB when we can get a rookie on a rookie deal?

Some of us here didn’t fall in love with Zach Wilson.

This happens every year, the first 2 QBs go off the board then the media fall in love with mediocre prospects. 
 

If we kept #3, I would’ve been opposed to getting Watson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Pantherzack179812 said:

Some of us here didn’t fall in love with Zach Wilson.

This happens every year, the first 2 QBs go off the board then the media fall in love with mediocre prospects. 
 

If we kept #3, I would’ve been opposed to getting Watson.

TBQH, even if we were at #1 overall, I wouldn't completely shut down the idea of obtaining Watson. I'd entertain offers from Houston, at least. 

I love Lawrence as a prospect but....Watson is an MVP caliber NFL QB. Proven and extremely young. I cannot recall a recent case of that being available like this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Surprised Jacksonville is not on that list.  Jacksonville could get an established and proven young star, and the Texans could draft Trevor L or whomever they please.   

An inter divisional trade to acquire Watson on a fat contract over Trevor Lawrence? No 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Anthony Hill Jr or give me death
    • We need a Sam Off Ball Backer to pair with Lloyd. Lloyd is a strong Interior Will especially in Pass Coverage- but that is also Trevin Wallace’s archetype. Need a Rozeboom style run stopper. Rodriguez and Allen fit that
    • There aren’t that many ways to screw Day 2 up.  That’d be them making an obvious reach, or selecting at one of the few positions that we are pretty solid at. Because as excited as we are for the growth and improvement this team is showing, it’s still not an overly talented or deep roster. Honestly, there aren’t really many positions I’d feel bad about. Feelings about Bryce aside (because we are not going to select a QB), it’s really RB (bad positional value) and that’s it. I guess OT too since we grabbed Freeling in Round 1.    While not as high on my wish list as other spots, you can justify WR or TE.     Interior offensive lineman who would likely take over an interior spot either this year (at center) or guard (next for cap casualty of Hunt or Lewis)? Fine by me.   Dlineman? Yes, that’s a highly rotational position and we have zero quality depth.    ILB? Yep, could stand for an upgrade over Wallace.    EDGE? Absolutely wouldn’t hate another option to spell Phillips, Scourton, and Princely.    FS?  Would love to add better coverage skill set to the backend of the defense. Moehrig and Ransom are great in run support but not as good deep. Adding a more traditional FS would allow us to mix and match/run some 3 safety sub packages and or a big nickel type look with a SS down near the line for better run support in possible pass downs.    CB? Could stand to get better at nickel. 
×
×
  • Create New...