Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Watson not the only big name vet at QB that we're looking at?

ncfan

By ncfan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

BurnNChinn Grand Master

BurnNChinn

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, MHS831 said:

If you cannot attack points with facts, do not attack the poster.  If you think any misfire on any pick is a reason to denounce all of their points after that, then you think all GMs are "dumb as hell."  Yet you offer no insights of your own-

Don’t come at me dude when u have no idea what we were talking about, you wasn’t commenting then so don’t comment now. He knows I don’t have to prove myself to anyone on here. Attack me again and I will be reporting u.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted
18 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

That depends on the resources spent. Stafford's money owed is extremely cheap for a player of his caliber. So if you could get him for a 3rd round pick(just throwing out an example), I'd make that trade in a heartbeat. 

And Stafford's playing style could mean 5 more years--he could go to age 38 or even longer if protected. 

Cam had about 6 good years, to put that in perspective.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, BurnNChinn said:

Don’t come at me dude when u have no idea what we were talking about, you wasn’t commenting then so don’t comment now. He knows I don’t have to prove myself to anyone on here. Attack me again and I will be reporting u.

So you are now making the rules of engagement?  Report me--I am actually being nice right now.  If you want this to be between you and the poster, then get off a public discussion board. 

Dude.

 

Edited by MHS831
  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
BurnNChinn Grand Master

BurnNChinn

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

So you are now making the rules of engagement?  Report me--I am actually being nice right now.  If you want this to be between you and the poster, then get off a public discussion board. 

Dude.

 

This is a discussion board. Then u bring something up that was said over 20 hrs ago great job sir

Link to comment
Share on other sites
joemac Grand Master

joemac

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, BurnNChinn said:

Don’t come at me dude when u have no idea what we were talking about, you wasn’t commenting then so don’t comment now. He knows I don’t have to prove myself to anyone on here. Attack me again and I will be reporting u.

LMFAO

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rocky Davis Veteran

Rocky Davis

Posted
Posted
On 1/20/2021 at 3:37 PM, TSLA said:

Pederson was fired because he threw away the last game of the season. Do you even pay attention to football? Quit making things up.

Hey there you football savant!  I wanted to make you aware of Philly's coaching hire and what was stated about the hire in the ESPN article:  "The Eagles coaching search was done with the quarterback situation -- Carson Wentz, in particular -- in mind. After firing Doug Pederson, whose relationship with Wentz had soured, Eagles owner Jeffrey Lurie said: "It behooves us as a team with a new coach, a new coaching staff, to be able to really get [Wentz] back to that elite progression."

Never question if I pay attention to football...maybe take a look in the mirror.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
12 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah, I think Stafford has a lot of shelf life left if he decides to have a long career. 

I think the requirement now is that if you want Stafford, you have to beat Dan Campbell in a cage match.

No disrespect, but I'm not so sure Rhule can take him.

  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Tbe
      Panthers Select Xavier Legette with Pick 32

      By Tbe · Posted

      This team once again got tunnel vision on one guy. This might be my biggest issue with the trade. It points to the same behavior that led us to drafting the fewest prospects in the league over the past 3 years. They need to let the draft come to them and stop chasing ‘their guys’.
    • dxpanther
      Why the Panthers drafted Xavier Legette

      By dxpanther · Posted

      Hopefully legette pick will put Mingo on notice 
    • MHS831
      Panthers Select Xavier Legette with Pick 32

      By MHS831 · Posted

      Buffalo was in need of a WR, and after Pearsall was drafted, the Panthers may have figured that a team needing a WR (like the Panthers, for example) could trade up with Buffalo to get the fifth year option at the end of the first round.  Look at the teams picking early in the second round and look at the big board.  There is going to be a run on WRs.  This not only provided the Panthers with the fifth-year option, but it assured them that nobody was going to deal with Buffalo, and Buffalo was not going to take Legette.  So Bean decided to upgrade his day three sixth rounder to a fifth, and Morgan got his guy and the fifth year option.  Win Win.  Obviously Buffalo was open for business, so if you consider the fact that Buffalo might have been getting calls for the pick, Morgan switched places with Buffalo.  It is likely that Buffalo did not want to drop farther than 33, so they dealt with Carolina--dealing with anyone else would risk losing Mitchell, the guy they probably covet (or Ladd).  The ONLY team who was assured they are not going to lose their guy is Buffalo.  I am not sure this deal goes down unless Morgan tells Bean who he was going to take and that Beane trusted Morgan's word.  After pick 33.... Pick 34.  New England needs a receiver. Pick 36.  Washington needs a receiver. Pick 37.  Chargers need multiple receivers. Pick 44.  Raiders need a receiver. Pick 45. Saints need a receiver. The NFL Draft ESPN Big board for "Best Remaining" Players features 3 Wide Receivers in the next 7 picks.  I am guessing that Buffalo wants Mitchell, and when the Panthers decided to go with Legette, they were willing to deal.  
×
×
  • Create New...