Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Bucs at Packers NFC Championship Gameday thread


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

The hold didn't impact the INT at all. If the ball had been thrown out in front where it should've been the hold would've been obvious. Since it wasn't and it was behind the receiver leaving him to have to try to fight his way through the DB the hold was only visible from the correct angle. Rodgers threw a trash ball that was easily picked. It should've been a non-issue because there was a hold, but the trash throw made the hold much less obvious than it would've been otherwise.

When you hold WR while he’s running a route A.  You impact timing with QB and B. You ride his ass.  What you saw was both A and B.  There is a reason why holding is a penalty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ja Rhule said:

When you hold WR while he’s running a route A.  You impact timing with QB and B. You ride his ass.  What you saw was both A and B.  There is a reason why holding is a penalty.

The ball was thrown behind the receiver. If the bad throw was due to timing, a hold would've cause the ball to be further out in front. Rodgers is great but that throw was trash. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The ball was thrown behind the receiver. If the bad throw was due to timing, a hold would've cause the ball to be further out in front. Rodgers is great but that throw was trash. 

No...  “Holding” is before the ball is released.  If your regular speed on slat is 18mph and I hold you... you run 10mph.  QB assumes where WR will be when he throws. If I let you go right before ball is released and you accelerate to 18mph.  Will the ball be on front of him or behind?  Logic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Sean Payton's Vicodin said:

We are never going to see another QB like Brady. Just bask in the greatness, even if it is the Succs

I always had some respect for the Buccs. They’ve had to scratch and claw. Saints and  Falcons always ran on bullsht and the refs playing storymode for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A winning record would be nice, but I still have us winning around the 6 to 8 game mark. Realistically we should beat the Jets and Saints, that gets us to 5 wins. After that, we have to face a lot of potential play off teams and our divisional opponents. I think we’ll win 1 or 2 of those games to take us to 6 or 7 wins, perhaps 8 wins if we can spring a further surprise.  Is that enough progress for head coach and QB? I’m not sure, it will depend on performances and output. That said, it’s nice to be back in a position where we are thinking about the play offs.
    • I would tend to agree about not falling into the trap and paying a below average QB, but sometimes situations can “force” a team to pay that QB. For example, if we play ourselves into a 9-8 like record, then what options will we have in the draft? Or do we avoid the draft and trade for or sign someone in free agency?  I’m not convinced by the 2026 QB draft class. There’s some intriguing prospects but no one that really screams “draft me”. I’m not sure we’ve got anyone really that stands out as a trade candidate or free agent signing. So although we might not want to commit a big money contract to Young, him playing well and showing progress might force the team’s hand. 
    • Realistically we would be looking at no more than a mid round pick for Dowdle or Chuba. Are we really that desperate for a mid round pick? Not really. I would much prefer us utilise the two RBs in a 1-2 punch similar to how we used D-Will and Stewart. After all, Bryce is not Drew Brees. He won’t throw for 300+ yards and carry the team consistently as a passer. So having a strong running game with a 1-2 punch will be beneficial to him, and it will also be beneficial to the RBs because we can spell them and not overwork them.
×
×
  • Create New...