Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers offered "More than a 1st" for Stafford


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

I’ve never seen a team that sold a rebuild so hard “can’t build a winner overnight” try so hard to win overnight. Makes me think they’re just flying off the cuff with no real long term plan on how to build this team. Teddy didn’t make sense here and neither does Stafford. 

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why the hell would we trade away our future for Stafford? He’s not worth it at all. What has he ever done? Just, no. 
 

even though cam is not his former self I would rather bring him back for free. Way more accomplished than Stafford ever will be. 
 

the rams are idiots for giving up what they did. I’m so glad we didn’t go for Stafford. We can do much better without giving away everything. 

Edited by Herb
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, AceBoogie said:

I’ve never seen a team that sold a rebuild so hard “can’t build a winner overnight” try so hard to win overnight. Makes me think they’re just flying off the cuff with no real long term plan on how to build this team. Teddy didn’t make sense here and neither does Stafford. 

did get to the NFC Championship game year 2 of existence, so its possible

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, AceBoogie said:

I’ve never seen a team that sold a rebuild so hard “can’t build a winner overnight” try so hard to win overnight. Makes me think they’re just flying off the cuff with no real long term plan on how to build this team. Teddy didn’t make sense here and neither does Stafford. 

Good point the whole teddy and his contract over cam really made me question the front office big time . But the Stafford thing make sense just not at the price we were trying to give up . Yeah idk . We seem desperate instead of being calculated 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Tepper's Chest Hair said:

I could have stomached a future 1st + BW and whatever extra fluff.

This years 8th would have made me uncomfortable.

I am just more content that the Panthers are willing to look at any player, but at the same time not get into a ridiculous bidding war and grossly over pay.

You keep doing your due diligence, and things will fall into place.

Yeah, it’s better than never even trying to make a splash in FA like we used to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

Glad to see they are willing to do what it takes to win. 

And yet fans complain.  

You think that we’re that much better than the Lions that Stafford makes us a winner? We’re not. Signing Stafford gets you in the 8-8 range with this team. And what does that get you? QB purgatory. We gotta be patient and stay the course. We cannot compound the Teddy mistake. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...