Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rumor circulating between a potential Panthers/Niners QB swap... Teddy B for Jimmy G


FeelTheBurns53
 Share

Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, Basbear said:

He can cut Jimmy with no dead cap, this is like the Tri Turner for Okung trade. We should have just cut Turner. Okung played about 7 full games in total(for 13.5 million), another reason for Teddy poor play should be noted. His contract is at sportac and only had a 7 million SB, its in the clear. I bet we would be sending picks(2-5) for Jimmy, if this is true.

This QB changing teams could be the biggest stories of the off-season.

 

Didn’t realize this about Jimmy G’s contract. You are probably right. He doesn’t see much of a drop off and expects to get some additional compensation from us. The Niners are probably looking to trade up and take their future QB in the draft. Watch them swap QBs with us plus additional picks, and then use our own picks to jump us in the draft and take a QB we were wanting....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Actually we won that trade. When Okung played he was very good and we got out from under Turner's deal. 

Id rather had the 13.5 in cap space, even before Okung struggled to play 7 games. Even if you didnt use it, roll it over to this year. Turners contract ended up being like many others, terrible. I watched some of Hards knocks, he could cosplay as a melting grimace to the nines. Turner didnt play many games either, to me it was a lose lose trade for both parties. We should have just cut him and not pay Okung 13.5 to play 7 games while Teddy had to fear for his life(imo). 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Didn’t realize this about Jimmy G’s contract. You are probably right. He doesn’t see much of a drop off and expects to get some additional compensation from us. The Niners are probably looking to trade up and take their future QB in the draft. Watch them swap QBs with us plus additional picks, and then use our own picks to jump us in the draft and take a QB we were wanting....

People in this thread thinking 49ers will be sending the picks, LOL!!

 

  9ers must think he has value, pats rumors are all out there. A big issue is the reduced cap, team are not wanting to pay QBs these 30 mill salary when the cap is 180. So many teams are out there thinking they could find cheaper QBs. One team could start a frenzy of movement. My best guess is only about 10 QBs are "safe", that means 22 spots could be traded, cut, or drafted. One swap already happened, I forsee many more, but some maybe in order to clear room. Plus teams are hearing what some teams want, and moving on to different options...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This rumor has no credibility whatsoever, but it would be a homerun for the Panthers.  I don’t think some of you realize how much better Jimmy G is then Teddy.  Jimmy just hasent been healthy the last two seasons (which is troubling), but he is a significant upgrade imho.  
 

Jimmys super bowl season he had no weapons outside of Kittle (they had to acquire old ass Manny Sanders) and he was awesome.  With what we have here the sky’s the limit.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Moo Daeng said:

Doesn't make sense for either team. I can't say I believe this one at all.

For the 49ers they would be getting picks and a QB thats able to play 15/16 games and backup if needed.

 

Panthers would be able to get off paying Teddy 10 mill, no matter what. Thats his guarantees, along with another 8 million in base. 

They must not like the other options out there, I want them to stay put at 8 and hope theres a QB they like still available. Plus being in 5 deals, puts more control in your hands.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yep so its essentially working against us
    • Solid point about the rookie contract especially since I believe Tepper and company brought that up, he was so good we could sign other players while he is on a rookie deal and capitalize on the cap space. Sorta like Seattle did with Russ while he was on a rookie deal. But, problem is Bryce isn’t close to that version of Russ and Tepper sucks as an owner. 
    • Look at who they’re interviewing there.  parcels, aikman, Peyton etc. the youngest guy is KOC who’s forty.  The passing game 25, 35, 45 years ago looked less glamorous to be sure but it was far more complex. You didn’t have these packages where you’d make quick checks, every play was its own thing, basically everyone was playing under center etc. once the nfl got out of the dead ball era things became very complex very quickly and they hadnt figured out a way to truncate it. Plus it was nowhere in college or high school. Vertical passing attacks just didn’t exist.  So yeah parcells probably does have that view because that’s what he came up in. Aikman had to learn that when he got to the nfl. Aikman was so lost his rookie season the cowboys almost took Jeff George first overall in 1990.  Today the learning curve is a lot lower. pro concepts today borrow a great deal from the college game now. Tons of air raid stuff, RPO, pistol, etc. even though everything is faster at every position, it’s schematically more simple. The learning curve is nowhere near what it was for even Peyton manning when he came out.  plus, prospects today are basically pro qbs from the time they’re in middle school. Bryce Young for example lived in invite only qb camps since he reached his max height at 12 years old. The whole “they shouldn’t get paid because they get a degree for free” was always just an insincere argument from racist old people, but no one even pretends to make it anymore. Playing qb at a division 1 school is a full time job for years before you even get to campus.  And that is all they do. The days of people excelling in multiple sports to the point there’s pro interest and then just choosing one or the other and succeeding are over. Aikman was drafted by the Mets out of high school and decided to go start as a freshman at Oklahoma.  The exact opposite is happening now, to the point you’ve got guys going to play baseball for a few years, coming back to college football, and playing until they’re like 27.  that’s actually one of the theories about why darnold isn’t better than everyone feels he should be. He only played two years of college football. In highschool he was first team all everything in every sport. Dude has an insane athletic pedigree. But there’s at least four years of highschool invite camps he never got to go to. You can’t just be the most athletic guy in the room anymore.  So obviously the older guys are complaining about how things are done; it’s what offer guys do. But the pro game today is much more accessible for these guys than it was back in their day, and the players are more ready for the transition. Like is anyone defending Anthony Richardson? What im saying is we know what Bryce young is and we should t wait for waiting’s sake. 
×
×
  • Create New...