Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rotoworld: Teddy is done in Carolina


Ja  Rhule
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, bobcat91 said:

No it doesn't when we are talking about the NFL. Great players in college dont always translate. Im not saying he's a bad qb and I really like him.  But not for 3 #1s, several #2s and 2 defensive starters. No, he isn't worth that

Watson is a 3 pipes and a snort dream, people just need to let go of that goofy idea!

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Relevance?

he made a point that when you have a chance to grab a legitimate MVP QB you have to do it. you cant just say youre gonna build your roster first and then get one later, you arent always going to have a chance to do that. the reason its relevant is because hes absolutely correct, you can have holes in your roster but if you have an MVP caliber Qb youre always gonna be at the dance

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 08/02/2021 at 12:36 AM, FuFuLamePoo said:

Yeah with fuging Evans, Godwin, Gronk, Miller, a top 5 OL, and vastly improved defense. Watson was being held back by the worst defense in the league and personnel decisions within his organization are being made by a pastor.

It's crazy how people can continue to question Brady.

He's won SEVEN Super Bowls. We might never win one.

He's significantly better than Watson - thats just the facts of the matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/8/2021 at 12:56 AM, Panthers8969 said:

Tbt to all the guys on here that thought he was good bc of his 5-0 record on the saints! Zero football knowledge 

After I actually went and watched those 5 games and realized Teddy was carried by a potent Saints running game and Michael Thomas bailing Teddy out with miraculous wizardry catches, I knew it wouldn’t end well. I’m on record many times last offseason saying Teddy was no better than Kyle Allen for a much more expensive price. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do think we are working ourselves into a position where we simply won't be able to roll with Teddy next year.  The whole team sport thing doesn't work that well when your starting QB knows a franchise doesn't want him. 

I think the end result will be us forcing our own hand and trading a poo ton to move up in the draft to get a QB.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

I do think we are working ourselves into a position where we simply won't be able to roll with Teddy next year.  The whole team sport thing doesn't work that well when your starting QB knows a franchise doesn't want him. 

I think the end result will be us forcing our own hand and trading a poo ton to move up in the draft to get a QB.  

There are too many options for us to fail at replacing teddy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

There are too many options for us to fail at replacing teddy. 

Are there?  

There is the draft? But we aren't sitting in a safe position to get one of the main 4.  We will need to move up.  Which is fine but I think we are going to work ourselves into a desperate position where a team takes us for a lot simply because we won't be able to roll with the status quo. 

Outside of a mega deal to get Watson (longshot)....we likely are just swapping band-aid QBs on par w/ Teddy and tying up more pointless money IMO.   I personally don't want any QB not named Watson that is out there.  Is there really a point to bringing those dudes in?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, CRA said:

Are there?  

There is the draft? But we aren't sitting in a safe position to get one of the main 4.  We will need to move up.  Which is fine but I think we are going to work ourselves into a desperate position where a team takes us for a lot simply because we won't be able to roll with the status quo. 

Outside of a mega deal to get Watson (longshot)....we likely are just swapping band-aid QBs on par w/ Teddy and tying up more pointless money IMO.   I personally don't want any QB not named Watson that is out there.  Is there really a point to bringing those dudes in?  

your mind is made up it appears. There are many options at play for us. Just going to have to let it all play out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So how about the Mondays after we lose? Because those Mondays after the Jags, Pats, and Bills games better have been run suicides until your legs fall off...
    • Saints trade WR Shaheed to Seahawks Seahawks get: WR Rashid Shaheed Saints get: 2026 fourth-round pick, 2026 fifth-round pick Seahawks' grade: A- Saints' grade: B+ One of the NFL's hottest passing teams just got better. The Seahawks currently rank third in EPA per dropback (0.25) and first in success rate on dropbacks (53%). And now they are adding Shaheed in a move that makes sense both on the field and in terms of where the Seahawks are as a franchise. Shaheed, 27, is averaging 1.8 yards per route run this season. But I think that sells him short because that number is down a bit from his career average entering this year (2.0) and he's been playing a role that includes running fewer vertical routes (34%) compared to last year (44%). Shaheed also has consistently posted above-average open scores in ESPN's receiver score metrics, including a 63 this season that ranks 28th among wide receivers. As a complement to Jaxon Smith-Njigba, I expect Shaheed will run downfield more often and be a bigger threat in that role than rookie Tory Horton was. When Cooper Kupp returns, he and Shaheed will make for a nice pair of secondary threats behind one of the best receivers in the league in Smith-Njigba. This is the time to strike for the Seahawks. FPI gives Seattle an 84% chance to make the playoffs and a 5% shot at winning the Super Bowl. This addition helps boost their chances without mortgaging their future the way the Colts did in the Sauce Gardner trade. Shaheed is a pending free agent but given the leverage of the moment for the Seahawks and their need I think they ought to be plenty willing to pay the cost. Shaheed is young enough to where if Seattle doesn't retain him he should sign a free agent contract that would yield Seattle a compensatory pick -- if the Seahawks don't nullify that pick with signings of their own. Because the Seahawks currently have $79 million in cap space next year, per OverTheCap, getting that compensatory pick is not guaranteed. The Saints are not rolling in cap space the way the Seahawks are -- and thus would land a compensatory pick for Shaheed -- but they got more draft capital this way than they otherwise would have. Considering New Orleans' 1-8 record, this should have been an easy decision.
×
×
  • Create New...