Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

congrats to all the tampa bay fans and the tampa bay bucs


Mister
 Share

Recommended Posts

49 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

They added 3 offensive players who, at one point in their careers not long ago, were the best at their respective positions--and they had 3 TDs together--the Bucs did not have to trade for them, draft them.  They were gift wrapped.  It was the most NBAish thing I have seen in the NFL. 

And for some reason, the refs in the Super Bowl think the team with the legendary, aging QB does not commit penalties.

 

i told my friends theyre the Brooklyn Nets of the NFL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m not sure how I would feel if I was a long time Bucs fan and you essentially bought a Super Bowl win. I get some people wouldn’t care but I honestly don’t know how I would feel about seeing Tom Brady in your favorite teams uniform hoisting a Lombardi. Would be weird.

Edited by TheRumGone
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, SmittysLawnGuy said:

I have lived in Florida for over 20 years now but still barely cared who won. I did enjoy watching Tom win his 7th. We're watching history. This will never be repeated. Take some enjoyment in that. Tom Brady has been in nearly 10% of all Superbowls. As an old man myself, I find it hard to route against him. We'll get one someday. Just hope I'm alive to see it.

It's nearly 20% FYI. 10 out of 55

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Panthers8969 said:

No... the implication is that facing a team with an injured OL makes it easier for his team to win. You disagree with this?

You mean having a healthier squad increases your chances to win? Still had little to do with Tom Brady’s performance. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hulu +Live: $88.78 Amazon Prime: $16.00 (w/FanDuel: $36.12) Apple TV+: $10.66 Netflix:$26.68 Is all still $80 less per month than what I was paying for DirecTV when I gave it up a few years ago. 
    • I just don't know that he has the time to turn it around at his age. His age is going to be a major strike against him in the recruiting trail and it's just a tough row to hoe to turn a football program around. One good recruiting class can turn around a basketball team. Hell, one individual recruit can turna around a basketball team - Carmelo Anthony basically won a national championship single handedly at Syracuse. Cam at Auburn is the only college who even comes close to that type of impact off the top of my head. A good recruiting class is 2-3 years down the road from significantly impacting a college football program... if you can actually keep them around. The instant impact is in the portal but everyone else is chasing those guys too. If I was building a college program, I'd focus almost exclusively on the trenches starting out. To me, that's the big difference in college. The better teams dominate the trenches. There's just a LOT more talent disparity at the college level than there is the NFL level. The worst teams in the NFL are still full of guys who were all conference or all American at the college level. The gap between the best team in the NFL and the tenth best team in the NFL is pretty small. A couple of plays might be the difference. The #1 team in the country is probably going to be a 10 point favorite over the #10 team at the college level. The gap on talent between the #1 team and the #32 team is a massive gulf. The #1 team's backups would be competitive against the #32 team. I just don't know if Belichick after a career in the NFL was prepared for the level of talent disparity he was going to face.
    • I wouldn't drop David Moore, honestly. Moore, while long in the tooth and light in production, is about the only veteran presence in the WR room now and the only one with extensive experience with what Canales wants and needs. And that's probably why he made the roster. Still, aging safeties who might make a decent gunner just aren't where you want to spend your money and roster spots. Even at vet minimum, he's not going to be as cheap or maybe as trainable as some UDFA who would run through a brick wall for a roster spot for rookie league minimum and a chance.
×
×
  • Create New...