Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CBS 2020 NFL Redraft -- 3 Panthers in first round


Tommy Jone
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, Moo Daeng said:

YGM at 14? Not sure about that. How does he go ahead of Chinn when he showed just enough to say he might have been worth his second round selection?

Yea, I don’t understand justifying our pick with we need secondary help, but we don’t select the member of our secondary that was runner up for defensive ROTY. Doesn’t compute. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Assuming this was more a Matt Rhule draft and not a Hurney draft ::ducks:: it feels good to know we’re in good hands. Even if you may not agree with how high YGM is in this redraft we picked some absolute studs this year between Brown Chinn and YGM with Pride being a decent bit behind but I stillI believe Pride is going to be a very solid NFL player for a long time. And even Roy had a few moments for a late round pick. 
 

IF Tepper allows Fitt and Rhule to do their jobs without too much interference on draft day I feel *really* good about this draft. I feel so good I’m honestly cool with staying at 8 and letting the draft chips fall where they may tbh.

Edited by CashNewton22
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/12/2021 at 6:44 PM, unicar15 said:

Interesting how highly thought of YGM is by this guy. If that’s the consensus then imo we clearly have assets to go get Watson even if it means keeping Burns, Chinn, and Brown. First round picks, YGM, Shaq. That is basically exactly what the Texans are asking for in return. 

Ok for fugs sake, fugIN ENOUGH.

Watson is an extremely stupid idea, even more so if it means trading away all the talent we currently have, only to finance a Newton-style beating for Watson, and then not being able to afford any new talent because all our money will be invested into him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...