Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If we trade for squatson, do we go wr as early as possible?


RumHam
 Share

Recommended Posts

No samuel and anderson being sent in the trade leaves a "stud" qb with no options. WHERE HAVE I SEEN THIS BEFORE!?

Why you don't trade. But since its inevitable, we need a wr. Not sure where cap space will set and who can be signed but you gotta pair him with an elite wr and no DJ isnt elite

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ImaginaryKev said:

What does squatson even mean

I'm gonna guess they mean he is squatting on his contract? Idek. 

However, back to the OP, I think the Texans want defensive players. Either way, if we traded for Watson, we'd surely draft some protection for him. You don't make a trade that big just to have the guy killed. We all saw what happened to Cam in SB50 and what happened to Mahomes just recently. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WRs have never been important for super bowl and deep playoff contenders. See cam 2015.

What we need is what these teams all have in common. An oline. See cam 2015 again.

If the trade includes defensive players, might need to focus on drafting what all those teams had in common as well, a defense.

WR is literally the last position to look at.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...