Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Report: 49ers called Panthers about Teddy Bridgewater


WarPanthers89
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Breakpoint4510 said:

If you don't give Teddy credit for the wins, why do you blame him for the losses? Are you two faced or something? So you are looking for a super hero to as you say drag this bag of bones called the Panther to a super bowl. Good luck with that. Here's a tip, when you go to find your hero, don't give up next years first cause it's going to be a good one.

Yeah just like when your old lady's phone blows up after the bars close is just guys doing their due diligence.

I was just quoting an article. You need to relax Teddy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Breakpoint4510 said:

Brady gave the ball to a fullback on fourth down with the game on the line with CMC lined up right beside him. You want to get rid of Brady now? 

Someone must have learned a new word, and now they think it applies everywhere. A strawman is when you invent an unrelated subject and then argue against it. Telling you that the defense and offensive line, and not Teddy, are the problems with the Panthers, is not unrelated to the subject, which happens to be the reasons to replace Teddy Bridgewater.

Brady took plenty of heat for that call and many others (you might see that if you ventured outside of the Teddy threads), and there were heaps of criticism thrown his way when all of the HC talk was happening. He was a first-year coordinator this year though so growing pain was/is expected - a very different story than someone who has been in the league for 6 years (7 now) and started multiple season's worth of games but still plays like a rookie. If Brady shows a lack of development beyond his rookie year, as Teddy has, then proper criticism will come his way along with proper expectations. At this moment though the two situations are not directly comparable.

But Brady is yet another strawman. You continue to present these arguments and deflect blame without acknowledging Teddy's performance, which is the only relevant topic in this QB-centric thread. You've been shown by myself and plenty of others how his deficiencies are self-contained and independent of other factors and yet continue to attack them... that's exactly what a strawman is.

Strawman: "an intentionally misrepresented proposition that is set up because it is easier to defeat than an opponent's real argument." Pretty apt description of your responses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, The Lobo said:

I was just quoting an article. You need to relax Teddy. 

I don't think it's Teddy himself, but I do believe someone from Teddy's entourage or maybe his agent are trolling the internet trying to recover his value. When you go 4-11 as a starter and don't have a single game winning drive in an entire season, aside from your value as an NFL player you might need to recover some confidence too. Fanbase absolutely shredded Bridgewater this season.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Breakpoint4510 said:

If you don't give Teddy credit for the wins, why do you blame him for the losses? Are you two faced or something? So you are looking for a super hero to as you say drag this bag of bones called the Panther to a super bowl. Good luck with that. Here's a tip, when you go to find your hero, don't give up next years first cause it's going to be a good one.

Yeah just like when your old lady's phone blows up after the bars close is just guys doing their due diligence.

Lol. Hey I respect you love a mediocre player so much you seem to want to jump on a grenade for him. But man you need to just calm down and realize Bridgewater isn’t that great. His stat were terrible with the Saints and he wasn’t that great with the Vikings. 
A starting QB doesn’t throw 15 TDs as an average. I would expect him to throw at least 20+ as I said above. Also I gave you stats that you promptly ignored. 
Also those 4 dudes in the draft, and even Mac Jones are much more talented then Teddy Checkdown. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Breakpoint4510 said:

Everything you said about the Cardinals, Chargers and the Falcons rings true about the Panthers. As a matter of fact, the Cardinals and the Chargers were better teams with better records than the Panthers. The Panthers defense was where opposing quarterbacks got paid. In a five point Panther loss blamed on Teddy Bridgewater, The future hall of famer Drew Lock roasted the defense lead by Teddy himself for 4 touchdown passes and a 149 rating for the game. I guess Teddy's got to work on his cover skills. But what must really gnaw at you guys is the fact that in two more games in which the Panthers lost by one score Teddy couldn't force the Chiefs or the Saints to punt not one time. I guess Teddy has to work on his tackling too.

I kind of see now why Teddy unfollowed the Panthers. I believe that he's telling whoever's running their mouth about finding a super bowl quarterback to get busy. Other teams must have heard the message too thus the phone calls. Answer the phone Panthers.

Believe me Teddy they will answer u gone bro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Breakpoint4510 said:

Why do I have to be Teddy? Can it be that your echo chamber is so small that you cant conceive that anyone can articulate support for Teddy Bridgewater?

Teddy doesn't have time for you. He's more than likely somewhere working on ways to beat what Tampa Bay, and New Orleans  will be throwing at him next year.

He might want to see what teams he is playing next year first, it wont be as a Panther. 

Its more likely he is finding new ways to deflect blame onto his teammates and coaches to cover up his short comings. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Breakpoint4510 said:

Brady gave the ball to a fullback on fourth down with the game on the line with CMC lined up right beside him. You want to get rid of Brady now? 

Someone must have learned a new word, and now they think it applies everywhere. A strawman is when you invent an unrelated subject and then argue against it. Telling you that the defense and offensive line, and not Teddy, are the problems with the Panthers, is not unrelated to the subject, which happens to be the reasons to replace Teddy Bridgewater.

That was one GAME, Teddy lost 8 games that needed one game winning drive. He couldn’t win any of them nothing to do with Brady on all of those other ones sorry. He can’t hit I mean wide open Moore in the endzone, and then he didn’t try to get first down on 4th and 9 with game on the fugging line. Line was no problem he knew he was throwing it 2 yds before he threw. You suck Teddy, BYE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, KSpan said:

Brady took plenty of heat for that call and many others (you might see that if you ventured outside of the Teddy threads), and there were heaps of criticism thrown his way when all of the HC talk was happening. He was a first-year coordinator this year though so growing pain was/is expected - a very different story than someone who has been in the league for 6 years (7 now) and started multiple season's worth of games but still plays like a rookie. If Brady shows a lack of development beyond his rookie year, as Teddy has, then proper criticism will come his way along with proper expectations. At this moment though the two situations are not directly comparable.

But Brady is yet another strawman. You continue to present these arguments and deflect blame without acknowledging Teddy's performance, which is the only relevant topic in this QB-centric thread. You've been shown by myself and plenty of others how his deficiencies are self-contained and independent of other factors and yet continue to attack them... that's exactly what a strawman is.

Strawman: "an intentionally misrepresented proposition that is set up because it is easier to defeat than an opponent's real argument." Pretty apt description of your responses.

So you expect Teddy to cover for a Rookie Play caller, a Rookie coach, a tissue thin defense, a patch work offensive line and a injured running back, with three smallish receivers and no tight end. Well he did, but the Einsteins here believe you can get blood out of an onion.

Teddy squeezed as much as he could out of this lemon, but NFL coordinators will eventually take away what you do well, and in this case it was the three amigos that couldn't consistently beat the tight man to man.

What I'm doing here is giving Teddy the same slack that you are giving Brady, Rhule, the o-line and the defense.  

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Breakpoint4510 said:

So you expect Teddy to cover for a Rookie Play caller, a Rookie coach, a tissue thin defense, a patch work offensive line and a injured running back, with three smallish receivers and no tight end. Well he did, but the Einsteins here believe you can get blood out of an onion.

Teddy squeezed as much as he could out of this lemon, but NFL coordinators will eventually take away what you do well, and in this case it was the three amigos that couldn't consistently beat the tight man to man.

What I'm doing here is giving Teddy the same slack that you are giving Brady, Rhule, the o-line and the defense.  

Teddy isn't a Rookie. He's a vet NFL QB that should better than to throw a 2 yard pass on 4th and 9. He's being paid $20M a year. Which is way too much to go 0-8 when you have a chance to tie or win the game. And after a few years in the league, guys like Rhule & Brady won't get the same slack they do as 1st year HC & OC.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

Lol. Hey I respect you love a mediocre player so much you seem to want to jump on a grenade for him. But man you need to just calm down and realize Bridgewater isn’t that great. His stat were terrible with the Saints and he wasn’t that great with the Vikings. 
A starting QB doesn’t throw 15 TDs as an average. I would expect him to throw at least 20+ as I said above. Also I gave you stats that you promptly ignored. 
Also those 4 dudes in the draft, and even Mac Jones are much more talented then Teddy Checkdown. 

With this team, mediocre puts you in the hunt for team MVP. Your stats are irrelevant because Teddy didn't need to throw 20 touchdown passes to win. He needed an offensive line that could handle stunts and blitzes. 

Your problem is that you are impatient. You have visions of getting to a super bowl by giving away draft capitol and young talent for a quarterback who needs draft capitol and young talent in order to build a winning team. This is what teams like the Jets and the Browns do.   

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Breakpoint4510 said:

Teddy squeezed as much as he could out of this lemon, but NFL coordinators will eventually take away what you do well, and in this case it was the three amigos that couldn't consistently beat the tight man to man.

Yikes. 

Look man, I love Teddy the person. I was born and raised in Louisville. I was at the Sugar Bowl in the student section when he whooped the Gators in what at the time was the biggest upset in BCS bowl game history. Hell, my 10 year old Dog who I've had since he was a puppy is NAMED Teddy. Teddy Bridgewater is on my Louisville Athletics Mt. Rushmore. Like I said, I LOVE Teddy. 

But this take? Not even insinuating, but outright saying that DJ Moore, Curtis Samuel and Robby Anderson can't beat tight man and THATS why the offense struggled? I can't get behind that. Thjs is close to the worst take in the history of this message board and I was here for the Jimmy Clausen truthers.

There are numerous examples of all 3 of those WRs bailing Teddy out on poor throws, being missed on deep throws either because Teddy lacks the arm strength to get them the ball. At the end of the day simply does not have the physical tools to get it done at the NFL level as a high end starter. 

Do better man.

Edited by SteveSmithTD89
  • Pie 3
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, EgoDogg said:

Teddy isn't a Rookie. He's a vet NFL QB that should better than to throw a 2 yard pass on 4th and 9. He's being paid $20M a year. Which is way too much to go 0-8 when you have a chance to tie or win the game. And after a few years in the league, guys like Rhule & Brady won't get the same slack they do as 1st year HC & OC.

Teddy is the quarterback of the Panthers, he's not Jesus. If the only thing available is two yards then that's what you do. If he throws it into coverage and it gets picked you would be crying about that.

Question, who called the plays and sent in the personnel during that 0-8 stretch? How many opposing quarterbacks had career days during that stretch? How many running backs had 99 yard touchdown runs during that stretch? I'll be here all day. How many left tackles played during the 0-8.

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...