Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

I'd trade T2G for Darnold but I think 2 is going to be too rich for us to move. I expect they'll want at least 3 1sts or maybe 2 1st 2 2nds and a 3rd or 2.

Good grief....no way we should even consider that

Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

I'd trade T2G for Darnold but I think 2 is going to be too rich for us to move. I expect they'll want at least 3 1sts or maybe 2 1st 2 2nds and a 3rd or 2.

for Sam Darnold? 
 

Link to post
Share on other sites
46 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

I'd trade T2G for Darnold but I think 2 is going to be too rich for us to move. I expect they'll want at least 3 1sts or maybe 2 1st 2 2nds and a 3rd or 2.

According to the article, we trade CMC, plus picks #8, and #39.

"If they could somehow convince the Jets to take Christian McCaffrey, the No. 8 pick and a little sweetener for the No. 2 pick, the Panthers would come out as a massive winner. This is not any hatred toward one of our favorite NFL players in CMC, who is an absolute stud on and off the field, but paying a running back $16 million per year isn't a winning strategy."

Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, X-Clown on 1 said:

I wouldn't even trade back for Wilson.... cement in his shoes.

Just curious how you came to that conclusion? I’ve watched him play a lot his feet work needs alittle work but cement in his shoes ? You might be thinking of mac Jones 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sheesh, just offer the Jags four #1s and Teddy Bridgewater for their pick. 

At this point, what's the harm. If you are going to trade away the future, might as well get the pick of the litter.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Khyber53 said:

Sheesh, just offer the Jags four #1s and Teddy Bridgewater for their pick. 

At this point, what's the harm. If you are going to trade away the future, might as well get the pick of the litter.

I agree .. if we going all in for qb .... might as well ....

 

I will say khan will not trade this pic,,. Tlaw on any team jumps the team evaluation a bunch meaning $$$$$$.... the marketability alone is worth mega bucks 

  • Pie 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm down. I've said it before that Lawrence is by far the safest QB pick in the draft but it won't shock me a bit if Wilson ends up being the best.

What team drafts you impacts your success/career as well.

I personally think the Jags made the wrong hire once in a position to draft Lawrence.   You find yourself in position to draft golden boy....and follow it up with hiring a controversy plagued college coach in Urban Meyer. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...