Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Teddy Bridgewater likely on the outs in Carolina


Verge
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 3/7/2021 at 1:21 PM, jayflip said:

What should we expect for Teddy?

Kyle Allen fetched us a 5th last year if I remember correctly

If I was a team taking on that ridiculous contract, I’d offer a conditional 7th pending Teddy Check-down carrying my team to the Super Bowl and also making 1st Team All-Pro plus a case of Gatorade.

And I’d really hate to overpay with that case of Gatorade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yeah, three mid-rounders for Teddy? My god, what a coup that would be 

At this point it would be as much about someone paying that much for him and the contract. I can see a team valuing having a quality backup but that $21MM would be a tough pill. 

I'm also assuming that they wouldn't be looking to trade and drop him into a starting role, but maybe I'm overestimating the wisdom of other FOs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL at people that even bring up the idea of freaking Gardner Menshew.... crazy thing is some of those people are the main ones wanting to get rid of Teddy. In the NFL eyes I am sure Teddy is thought of as the better player and there are actually people on here who want another solid back up. Heck, Bridgewater would get more compensation than Menshew. Both back ups

Edited by Jared Patterson
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Thomas9289 said:

I feel like they would have took that in a heartbeat. 

That guy is terrible, he is always wrong. Then he came out and called out people that said he always wrong. He was like to all y’all that says I’m always wrong Wentz to colts was heard from me first. Lmao I’m not a reporter and knew that was going to happen 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, KSpan said:

At this point it would be as much about someone paying that much for him and the contract. I can see a team valuing having a quality backup but that $21MM would be a tough pill. 

I'm also assuming that they wouldn't be looking to trade and drop him into a starting role, but maybe I'm overestimating the wisdom of other FOs.

They’d almost have to, assuming next they move Jimmy G. That’s over 40 mil a year tied up in 2 awfully mediocre QBs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm going to be real, the reason that vote ended up so lop-sided by the end was directly due to my programming. So there's nothing tongue in cheek about it. Also I left PFF after the Collinsworth acquisition (didn't want to move to Cincy) but have stayed involved in analytics via backdoor channels, but I can absolutely say that the experience was eye-opening, not because those guys are unquestionable football savants and that I became one by proxy, but because the amount of information that becomes available outside of what the typical fan has access to is revelatory and also really drives home how much context is still being missed even with all of that information. You don't discover that you know everything, you discover how much you still can't know no matter how hard you try, hence my point about the NFL not being able to figure out what makes a QB good. There's a lot of AI work going into that now and even that only seems to further confuse things vs. actually enlighten the problem. In the professional realm teams don't really talk about quarterbacks as A strictly being better than B, but how A can potentially perform better than B given a specific context of C. Of course those contexts may be wider for A than B, but there's also contexts where B can outshine A, even with lesser talent surrounding them. So what good teams strive to do is ultimately define a process of how they want their entire team to operate under schematically, find players that fit that scheme, and hopefully find a guy whose skillset will be maximized running that scheme with those players. Where bad teams fall of the wagon is constantly shifting those schemes and chasing bad fits or fads vs. sticking with a core identity and developing it.
    • there is a 100 mile long list of NFL players and coaches going to bat and defending horrible play from teammates.   
    • In 6 games, we've only had 6 hurries??? ... that can't be accurate
×
×
  • Create New...