Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Richard Sherman thinks Mac Jones criticized unfairly


panthers55
 Share

Recommended Posts

Quickness to process, read, and release is key the less agile the QB is.

Mac seems to be pretty quick on his feet and is quite good with finding the right guy to throw it to, but it's not an obvious, glowing "OMG this kid is awesome" type thing.   He's pretty darn crisp in the pocket but I dunno.  I'd like to see the kid at least in the Tannehill/Rodgers range of pocket movement these days.  It really seems the less agile QBs struggle unless they're on a Brady level these days.

I think best case with him is he produces Derek Carr type numbers and you need a lot of talent around him to win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, d-dave said:

I can see Sherman wanting to stick up for a guy with percieved physical limitations, like what caused Sherman to slip.

But jones has much more going against him than the physical limitations.  He's hard to evaluate.  When has an Alabama QB lived up to the hype and produced in the NFL?  Tua?  Mac couldn't beat out Tua.  

To me, that is the biggest problem I have with Mac Jones.  He is physically limited, and he also comes from a system that made it easy for him with the best athletes in the world around him.  It's hard to figure him out.

When? Stabler and Joe Willie were pretty good. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mage said:

Brees can’t scramble but I don’t think I would call him immobile. His pocket movement has always been incredible.

And Mac could have the same ability.  But we don't really know.  Playing for Bama, he probably didn't have to move around in the pocket much.  They are much more talented than the majority of their opponents.  That is why it is so difficult to predict how good these guys are going to be when they have play in the NFL with more talent parity.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Bama Panther said:

Do you knock Trevor Lawrence for his supporting cast and level of competition?

TL is big strong fast and has a cannon. 

He pushed out the rising senior at his HS in spring of his 8th grade year.

He's lights out. Mac Jones is not. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Problem with Jones and most bama QBs is that they are surrounded by 5-star talent from the get-go.

The dude doesn't have to be mobile or the most accurate at all really, when all he has to do is just chuck the ball in the air for one of his 5-star receivers to just snatch it up.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, davos said:

Quickness to process, read, and release is key the less agile the QB is.

Mac seems to be pretty quick on his feet and is quite good with finding the right guy to throw it to, but it's not an obvious, glowing "OMG this kid is awesome" type thing.   He's pretty darn crisp in the pocket but I dunno.  I'd like to see the kid at least in the Tannehill/Rodgers range of pocket movement these days.  It really seems the less agile QBs struggle unless they're on a Brady level these days.

I think best case with him is he produces Derek Carr type numbers and you need a lot of talent around him to win.

You need a lot of talent around someone to win the big game, that's for sure. Even Brady had to have the deck stacked in his favor to win the Super Bowl this year. Mahomes had a fantastic supporting cast around him the season before.

We can look back to our own last Super Bowl appearance and see that even Cam Newton couldn't carry the game on his own shoulders when it came to the championship. 

I think Jones would do well here, but he would need a better o-line. Then again, any QB here would need a better o-line to succeed. Jones has the tools, has the processing speed, the accuracy and has been at a higher level of competition than you'd see BYU or NDSU coming up against week to week. 

He'll be the pick, or we'll regret seeing him twice a year in a Saints uniform.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given he is widely anticipated to go some place later in the first or shortly thereafter, I don't think he is being unfairly criticized.  When people talk about his arm strength and athleticism they are in reference to what you want out of a top pick, which is usually elite levels.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mage said:

Brees can’t scramble but I don’t think I would call him immobile. His pocket movement has always been incredible.

Brees was the top ranked tennis player in Texas ahead of Andy Roddick. The guy has always had fluid footwork.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not that I want Jones at all but, it is good to know that our staff spent a lot of time with him at the senior bowl so they will have really liked what they saw. They'll have a good idea of who he is and what he can do.  It would give me some comfort. I hope it doesn't happen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Martin said:

The problem I have is that his margin of error is so small. Feels like he has to be Brady or Brees to ensure his physical limitations don’t become an issue. And I don’t think he is.

And that's the thing...  even Sherman is saying guys like Brees and Brady as best-possible outcomes...  problem is, those guys are outliers, and I don't mean just in terms of their ability to excel as less than superior athletes.  I'm saying they are guys, who regardless of style of play, are among the best to EVER play, and not only overcame odds to make it to the NFL, but then overcame even more odds by defying their shortcomings to not just survive, but thrive.  So, are you willing to take a risk on a Mac Jones and hope he overcomes his lack of athleticism and arm strength to become Brees or Brady (but if he doesn't, then he quickly becomes useless because he has nothing to fall back on)?  Or would you rather pick a guy who has the athleticism and big arm, thus improving their odds of succeeding by default because they already possess an advantage over guys like Jones?  

Sure, Jones could become Brees or Brady, but odds are much higher he becomes a Bridgewater or Chase Daniels.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

And Mac could have the same ability.  But we don't really know.  Playing for Bama, he probably didn't have to move around in the pocket much.  They are much more talented than the majority of their opponents.  That is why it is so difficult to predict how good these guys are going to be when they have play in the NFL with more talent parity.  

However, the opponents of quality they played were the best the season had to offer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A lot of people have been slobbing all over this last draft but I hate the way that Fitterer/Morgan have built this offense since drafting Bryce. Anyone with eyes knew our IOL was crap but we didn't invest there and instead took project receivers and an injured RB. If you want a lesson in how build for your QB wrong, IMO, this was it. Draft him, protect him, THEN get him weapons. Its pretty much a rule, draft interior linemen, pay tackles. We're paying everyone. We had the opportunity to draft a center instead of Brooks, or perhaps instead of trading up for XL, trade back and take 2 guards/center. We could have paid Lewis and still drafted 2, but Hunt at 100m was just an overpay. And it's not like the guys many of us were begging us to draft were long shots. They're solid starters from day 1. Injuries happen. That's why all your starters can't be high value players. You need rookie contracts mixed in to be able to absorb those inevitable losses on the line. An offensive line playing an entire season together is an abnormality.  Factor into that also paying Moton 44m this offseason with a huge signing bonus when we didnt need to do right now to do him a "solid".  Now we have to sign Icky and possibly Bryce and it's a mess with more money tied up in the offense, inevitable cuts and dead cap coming. That's not even factoring in shifting Corbett to C last year after major injury to start at a position he's never played for an NFL season. It's all stuff that was foreseeable and pretty easily avoided.  The $$ and picks we've spent trying to surround Bryce outside of Tmac (Mitchell and Horn are TBD) have been used inefficiently IMO. Smarter drafting and FA with the line could have let us get more reliable weapons than XL and Sanders in FA. It might not be popular opinion, but I'll take a Bersin with hands that can get 6-8 85% of the time vs a big play XL with greasy fingers.  The part about hitting guys in stride was more about placement, which Bryce has struggled with. Obviously not every route is run to be hit in stride, but they do need to have the ball placed well to give the receivers a chance to do something after the catch. I just used Hill as an example because he's the biggest YAC threat I could think of over the past 5 years.   Receivers can feast on dink and dunk if it's schemed right. But to make it work, that vertical threat has to be there, if not the deep pass then the high speed routes that can spring someone for the huge YAC to keep the safeties from cheating into that 20 yard box all game.  I hope DC and Bryce can keep up what they did in the last game and it isnt just an Atlanta thing. But no matter what, I really want to see some better long term strategy coming from the FO. 
    • Eh. Don't speak it into existence lol. We've got enough on our plate just trying to overcome the bad juju of what has been our historically bad perfomances more often than not in primetime over the course of 30 years. We're overdue for a statement primetime game!
    • Passing chart had 3 over 20 I think. The Legette TD and another completion and an incompletion. All over 20 yards.  An incompletion at 19 or maybe 20 yards. So you could technically probably say 4 throws 20 or more.     That seems high to me compared to the norm. 45 throws and 10 YPA are both way high.   
×
×
  • Create New...