Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers sign OT Cam Erving - 2 years, 10 million, 8 fully guaranteed


Varking
 Share

Recommended Posts

Elflein:

2020: 419 snaps, 1 penalty, 2 sacks allowed

2019: 919 snaps, 8 penalties, 6 sacks allowed (avg)

3 years, $6 mil guaranteed (2 mil/yr)

Erving:

279 snaps, 1 sack allowed, 1 penalty in 2020. (banged up, didn't play the season)

589 snaps, 7 penalties, 5 sacks allowed in 2019 (meh)

He's an average, decent signing.  Nothing to be disappointed about at all, $8 mil guaranteed over 2 seasons is totally reasonable. 

-

This is totally fine, these signings make complete sense in respect to what they've been saying.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Verge said:

I don't hate the signing, depth is nice, it's just so odd on day one of FA and doesn't really feel like it fixes a problem.

I don't hate the signings either as far as quality.

I was, however, hoping to get away from depending on "good when healthy" or "coming off of injury" players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I guess they know something about the market that we don't know?  It's not jaw dropping by any stretch.  Just because the cap is down doesn't mean the demand is down for serviceable linemen.

It's two talented guys that haven't quite panned out in the NFL.

By the looks of it Fitterer and Rhule have decided they'd rather target the guys they want early and just get the deal over the line at what they consider a reasonable price than sit around and let the market dictate who we end up with.

It's aggressive - albeit not with the elite FAs. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Verge said:

I don't hate the signing, depth is nice, it's just so odd on day one of FA and doesn't really feel like it fixes a problem.

It fixes depth and possibly a starting guard, maybe two.  Take your small victories as they come.  It's a long war.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...