Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Report: The Panthers are "locked on Watson"

MVPccaffrey

By MVPccaffrey,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

MVPccaffrey Collaborator

MVPccaffrey

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 minutes ago, OneBadCat said:

Yeah hell no. Would rather lose CMC than both BB and Brown.

 

It's a hardball starting offer, that's how negotiations work.  We'll keep at least one of them, though I imagine one will go as part of the deal.

 

Get on board the Watson train or be left behind

Link to comment
Share on other sites
onmyown Grand Master

onmyown

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, MVPccaffrey said:

Ya'll thought the Penn State Panther fan traveling contingent was big during the Collins years, just wait until half the population of Death Valley shoots up 85N to support their favorite player ever on Sundays!

It’ll be the second biggest movement of white trash rednecks of the year!

(first being bicycle week at Myrtle obviously)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
t96 Grand Master

t96

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

No. That's five 1st rounders. Can't do that.

Burns is worth 2 first rounders for sure. Brown worth a top 10 pick or more. So that’s 2 top 10 picks and 4 other first rounders. Can only laugh at that.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MVPccaffrey Collaborator

MVPccaffrey

Posted
  • Author
Posted
3 minutes ago, Devil Doc said:

Are they High? Watson is good, but he is not that good. Give them the 8th this year, a second and third next year, and a coupon to Bojangles. 

Tepper will give them whatever they want eventually, maybe after talking them down a pick and a player, but we will do it, a lot of fans will whine about it, but they'll pretend they were FOR it the whole time as we're winning the division year after year

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted (edited)

So let's watch free agency to see if we are preparing for him---so far, I see OL depth--maybe a starting LG--but I am not happy with the picks, to be honest after a day of letting them sink in.

I guess that means Trubiski is out.

It does not mean drafting a QB is out. 

Edited by MHS831
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...