Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

It's happening. (Probably)


Verge
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Jon Snow said:

See, that's where your theory goes off the rails.  He won't be on last year's team.  He will be on whatever is left of it.  Which won't be no where as talented or lucky as last year's.  

Yeah, his brain couldn't think through that hypothetical critically.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Was Palmer traded or released? I've forgotten.

(I could look it up but I'm feeling lazy)

He requested a trade after the 2010 season, owner said no fug you.  So Carson decided to retire, and Bengals placed him on reserved/retired list.  That same off-season the Bengals drafted Andy Dalton and halfway through the season they saw that Andy was going to be their next franchise QB, so they ended up trading Carson to the Raiders after their starter Jason Campbell got hurt. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DeSim said:

He requested a trade after the 2010 season, owner said no fug you.  So Carson decided to retire, and Bengals placed him on reserved/retired list.  That same off-season the Bengals drafted Andy Dalton and halfway through the season they saw that Andy was going to be their next franchise QB, so they ended up trading Carson to the Raiders after their starter Jason Campbell got hurt. 

Man, I'd forgotten Palmer even played for the Raiders.

(guessing he didn't really do anything memorable there like he did with the Cardinals)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MVPccaffrey said:

What's a better new handle?  WatsonMVP, MostValuableWatson, DeshaunHercules, TheDeushaunExpress, WhatCanDeshaunDoForYou, or WatsonMyMind?

I don't know...according to the latest news FillerUpWatson might be a good choice. 

(Totally kidding)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Man, I'd forgotten Palmer even played for the Raiders.

(guessing he didn't really do anything memorable there like he did with the Cardinals)

Yup, and I didn't even mention what the Raiders ended up giving up for him...a 1st and a 2nd round pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Man, I'd forgotten Palmer even played for the Raiders.

(guessing he didn't really do anything memorable there like he did with the Cardinals)

He got decapitated by Greg Hardy once. Other than that, he didn’t do much in Oakland.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, cookinbrak said:

Apparently they had the best QB ever and still sucked rod. 

Deondre  made Watson look better.

Watson had easily his best season ever without Deondre. There's no excuse for not knowing this given how easy it is to find out.

They still sucked because you need a good team to be a good team.

Edited by Moo Daeng
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We've got another viral Panthers song The dab is back Jags Week 1, Ohio State National Title, JLo got divorced...   Nature is healing, it's Super Bowl time
    • Its too late for that.  Time has run out.  You dont give him a ext if he plays "decent".  He played "decent" at the end of last year and look what happened.  
    • I’m not necessarily advocating sticking with Bryce. His highs show the ability is there, but there’s enough bad film out there to doubt that he can consistently enough play at a high enough level. But this video from Brett Kollman is a pretty good argument to give it a bit more time, whether that be rolling with Bryce just next year or picking up his 5th year option (not extending him).      The gist is that the structural (wider hashes) and rule (3 yd vs 1 yd thresholds for intelligible offensive lineman downfield penalties) differences in the college and NFL have led to wildly different play calling and scheme diets in college. There is much more shotgun and RPO calls in college and screen/quick throws. This simply doesn’t set up young QBs to be able to play under center, which is more preferred in the NFL due to RBs being able to more effectively run out of that formation.  They don’t know how to do it and have to learn. Yes, the NFL has trended more toward college style offense in the last decade or so, but it isn’t that pronounced and is more out of necessity than desire. And on top of all that, they ask the young QBs to do all this learning with coaching and other personnel churn going on around them.  Bad results lead to coaches getting fired and new ones with different ideas on scheme and footwork and different terminology and playbooks coming in. It makes it harder on those young QBs to learn.     So we may drop Bryce for a young QB starter in the draft and be in a similar situation. With a QB who is going to take years to learn how to operate in an NFL style offense and will struggle along the way.  So you have to weigh whether the struggles we see from Bryce are more due to this learning process vs solely physical limitations on his part. It’s almost undoubtedly a bit of both, but the answer to that question I think dictates your strategy at QB over the next few years. And of course, you have to consider what the alternatives available are.    I’m neither a Bryce hater or a Bryce Stan and I don’t have an answer to that question. But I do fear that if we move on from him, unless it’s for an established player, we’re just in for continued frustration on the QB front because it’s going to take a few years for a college QB to develop (Drake Maye’s don’t grow on trees). 
×
×
  • Create New...