Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

It's happening. (Probably)


Verge
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, joemac said:

Sure it does.  Houston does not want to trade Watson, I think that much is evident.  So, if the conspiracy theory is true, Houston could have done this in order to make Watson untouchable to any other team, so he has to come crawling back to the Texans, hat in hand, in order to get the rest of his 9 figure contract.

Watson could just say "Fine. Keep me on the payroll. Pay me for a couple more years, my contract runs out, I sign with anybody."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Panther Believer said:

You good, haha just said D wat was gonna come here back in early December and everyone clowned on me. 

Well these allegations it may be on hold until this plays out. I have to admit, it looks bad. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

Image

 

Um, so is this going to be a drawn out dilemma? 

He had a chance to pay to make it go away, he wanted to fight it. Now the NFL will 'investigate' so all signs point to a long litigious process for Watson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Waldo said:

He had a chance to pay to make it go away, he wanted to fight it. Now the NFL will 'investigate' so all signs point to a long litigious process for Watson.

Problem is, pay once, pay forever. Paying also implies guilt 


not sure why they didn’t go criminal even with ‘he said, she said’ if someone did  that to me,  and didn’t take no for an answer, cops would be called.

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

Problem is, pay once, pay forever. Paying also implies guilt 


not sure why they didn’t go criminal even with ‘he said, she said’ if someone did  that to me,  and didn’t take no for an answer, cops would be called.

 

It implies guilt to the public but it can easily be cheaper then legal fees and now in this case new issues. And one thing that lets you say fug the public is lots of fug you money. It would suck if you were innocent but it might not be the worst option by far.

If there are enough messages in relevant order to paint a coherent picture of what happened then it will all go public or just be enough to cast doubt. The entire thing stinks. At this point it a lot of possibilities while we wait for an investigated truth. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rodeo said:

really feel like it's not being talked about enough that this lawyer faked text messages from the mayor of houston when he was running against him

https://www.fox26houston.com/news/mayor-turner-calls-for-criminal-investigation-of-tony-buzbees-attack-ad

That lawyer is attention loon, but who cares about that hes not the one the case/S are against? If we always focus on lawyers(99.9087% of them are scum) courts would be empty cause people cannt get over the lawyers being awful sub-humans. I mean, big shocker this lawyer is scumbag....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sure it does, maybe not every position and not every draft.  You have to admit the hit rate goes down the further in the draft you get.  Would you more readily find a generational talent at the #2 pick or #19 pick?  High picks are considered "busts" if they doesn't pan out, whereas guys drafted later don't have that level of scrutiny upon them.  Different expectation levels.  If Styles does indeed go #2, I already listed the rarefied air that he would be in.  Maybe he doesn't set the League on fire, but my gut feeling is he does.  Again, you don't take an off-ball LB #2 if he is just a 'really good' player.
    • To illustrate my point, I watched (and commented on the Huddle) that Rozeboom would often wait a full second (or close to it) before taking his first step.  I assume that he probably had issues with false steps, a faulty practice that can take an ILB out of the gap completely.  Watch Luke and you see a step with the snap, and rarely was it a false step.  Rozeboom may have had 100 tackles (speculating) but initial contact was 2-3 yards on the defensive side of the ball.  Luke's 100 tackles were made 1-2 yards from the LOS.  Over the course of a year, Luke was much more productive (more fumbles, fewer long gainers, more OL penalties, fewer first downs, etc) that Rozeboom, but on the stat sheet, they both had 100 tackles.  In fact, Rozeboom's inefficiency kept him on the field more (more first downs, fewer OL penalties, turnovers, and punts) so he should have MORE tackles.   I would like to see stats that break down those things.   For example again, Josh Norman was slow--4.68 or so at CB.  However, his anticipation speed was incredible.  He made as many plays as a 4.4 CB.  I had one coach (college--later became the head coach at WCU) tell me that slower players have to use their brains more to still be around.  Elite athletes can just get by on their physical superiority.  He added, "Rarely does a football player run full speed.  Most of the time, they are not, so the 40 time is misleading stat.  Smart players overcome shortcomings--when the elite athlete becomes average (slows with age, advances in level of competition) they struggle against smarter (football IQ) competition.  
    • Obviously tongue in cheek hyperbole. But we do not need a first round RB to compete for a championship. We need intelligent roster building. That to me is the complete opposite of intelligent roster building because it is a prime resource at a devalued plug and play position when we have needs across the defense.
×
×
  • Create New...