Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Deshaun Allegations detailed (not good)


Mills
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Link one story, just one where Kraft was involved in/with trafficking or the spa that he frequented.

You cant

Did I say "Bob Kraft was guilty of human trafficking" or did I say there was a human trafficking angle to that story?

(might want to look back at the post before you answer)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the end of the day it doesn't matter what anyone thinks.  Nobody is trading for Deshaun Watson.  And you would have to be a fool to think that this is some conspiracy against him.  And if all 9 suits end up being filed?  It is a wrap.  
 

Right now our focus should be on what the Panthers will end up having to give up to move to the #3 or #2 overall pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mage said:

At the end of the day it doesn't matter what anyone thinks.  Nobody is trading for Deshaun Watson.  And you would have to be a fool to think that this is some conspiracy against him.  And if all 9 suits end up being filed?  It is a wrap.  
 

Right now our focus should be on what the Panthers will end up having to give up to move to the #3 or #2 overall pick.

Not saying that you won't end up right, but not saying that you won't end up wrong either. There are too many unknown details and a highly suspicious situation to draw conclusions at the moment. 

 

https://www.carolinahuddle.com/topic/168742-per-adam-schefter-“in-speaking-to-some-teams-i-don’t-think-this-is-going-to-deter-anyone’s-interest-in-trading-for-deshaun-watson”/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jackson113 said:

Commissioner's exempt list here he comes, like I said yesterday and y'all pooed it...

got to have more than Jane Doe from Instagram allegations to get on that list...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Link one story, just one where Kraft was involved in/with trafficking or the spa that he frequented.

 

You cant

Yeah because our media is known to be open, forthright and honest about things like that that reach to the highest levels of our government and society.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Mage said:

At the end of the day it doesn't matter what anyone thinks.  Nobody is trading for Deshaun Watson.  And you would have to be a fool to think that this is some conspiracy against him.  And if all 9 suits end up being filed?  It is a wrap.  
 

Right now our focus should be on what the Panthers will end up having to give up to move to the #3 or #2 overall pick.

This is my thought on this as well.  This will be a PR nightmare whether true or not.   Watson will be asked some uncomfortable questions by the media for a while.  This could get ugly, as if it's not ugly enough already.

Edited by Jon Snow
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’ve been on the Deshaun express as long as anyone but I can read a room.  9 women and counting?  Yup, trade is off the table, damnit.  At least not for anywhere near the original price.  Guess I’ll just resign myself to watching poo QB play for another five years

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.  Mock drafts 
    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
×
×
  • Create New...