Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Deshaun Allegations detailed (not good)


Mills
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

Rape can occur without verbally saying no.  I don't know the details and I'm not accusing Watson of rape, but what I read said he used language about making or breaking her career to coerce her into it.

This may still become a criminal complaint too. 

Her career is done in that regard either way. What does she think he meant by a statement like that? If she did it because she felt it would help her career, that’s not rape or sexual assault. That’s buyers remorse. Women have to be held to a higher standard in these situations. They have to be held accountable the same way as we hold men accountable. That’s the whole damn problem with this me too movement. Did we say Bill Clinton sexually assaulted Monica? Plenty of women out here fuging their way to the top and if that’s their thing then so be it, but you can’t turn around and call foul when you agreed to something you thought would help you and didn’t. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, AceBoogie said:

Put your name on it. Say he raped her. That’s what we’re talking about here. fug this sexual assault bs. What y’all and these women are accusing him of is rape. Let’s call it what it is. And if he raped anyone he should face criminal charges. Is he? Will he? If his name wasn’t Deshaun Watson is there a civil case? 

Goddamn dude

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Serious question. What are the odds of locking this thing up unless some real facts and information come out? People are speaking out against possible victims while knowing little information themselves. It seems to belong in Tinderbox or locked up. Once these cases become more clear maybe we can have an adult conversation without blaming potential victims or an innocent man depending on which way it goes...

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

One woman is accusing him of sexual assault, the others are not, from what I understand. 

I think the language of the lawsuits puts it all under the term "sexual assault" but only one of them so far indicates an actual sex act (forced oral sex).

The other allegations mostly involve exposing himself, unwanted touching, a forced kiss and attempts to force women to touch his penis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Aaron Wilson with an update. Teams are still interested conditional on his being exonerated, but they (wisely) want to see how this case turns out before proceeding.

Excerpt from the article...

The Eagles are among those teams along with the Panthers, Jets, Dolphins, 49ers and Broncos, according to sources.

It is because they could potentially get him at a huge discount. This exactly what I have suggested would happen all along. In every scenario the Texans lose the amount of leverage that they had. 
 

Since people like conspiracy theories imagine this, what Watson were traded and all of the complaints went away(dropped or settled) Now, as some may say, that would then be super sketchy!

I am also not suggesting that this would happen.

Edited by Monrowed
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, AceBoogie said:

Her career is done in that regard either way. What does she think he meant by a statement like that? If she did it because she felt it would help her career, that’s not rape or sexual assault. That’s buyers remorse. Women have to be held to a higher standard in these situations. They have to be held accountable the same way as we hold men accountable. That’s the whole damn problem with this me too movement. Did we say Bill Clinton sexually assaulted Monica? Plenty of women out here fuging their way to the top and if that’s their thing then so be it, but you can’t turn around and call foul when you agreed to something you thought would help you and didn’t. 

You really don't see a problem with anything you just said? Sheesh. It's smacking you right in the face and you can't even see it. 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, AceBoogie said:

Her career is done in that regard either way. What does she think he meant by a statement like that? If she did it because she felt it would help her career, that’s not rape or sexual assault. That’s buyers remorse. Women have to be held to a higher standard in these situations. They have to be held accountable the same way as we hold men accountable. That’s the whole damn problem with this me too movement. Did we say Bill Clinton sexually assaulted Monica? Plenty of women out here fuging their way to the top and if that’s their thing then so be it, but you can’t turn around and call foul when you agreed to something you thought would help you and didn’t. 

There's a difference between two parties of equal power agreeing to something, and someone of greater power effectively threatening someone else to do what they want. The later is the accusation here.  When that threat involves sex...

Regarding Bill and Monica, there's weird power dynamics at work there and I don't know enough of the details there.  However, if Bill had told her that he would make or break her career prior to or as part of them hooking up, that's coercion and assault yeah.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, AceBoogie said:

Women have to be held to a higher standard in these situations. They have to be held accountable the same way as we hold men accountable. That’s the whole damn problem with this me too movement.

Women already have an extremely difficult time with sexual assault cases as it is.

You really think it should be tougher?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, AceBoogie said:

Put your name on it. Say he raped her. That’s what we’re talking about here. fug this sexual assault bs. What y’all and these women are accusing him of is rape. Let’s call it what it is. And if he raped anyone he should face criminal charges. Is he? Will he? If his name wasn’t Deshaun Watson is there a civil case? 

No, he is kicked out of the sessions immediately if they do not offer what he is asking for and blacklisted throughout. He moved in a way that his penis would touch me, he would not cover himself, if he is not following the rules why are you even engaging with him? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Monrowed said:

It is because they could potentially get him at a huge discount. This exactly what I have suggested would happen all along. In every scenario the Texans lose the amount of leverage that they had. 
 

Since people like conspiracy theories imagine this, what Watson were traded and all of the complaints went away(dropped or settled) Now, as some may say, that would then be super sketchy!

I think the sketchiest thing would be if Deshaun Watson suddenly changed his tune and decided he wanted to play for the Texans again. Would make me thing that old daddy Bob McNair "made this all go away" in a weird blackmail situation. Ultimately I do not think the Texans want to trade Watson, there's obvious bad blood that goes really deep, and we don't know even 90% of the details.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I think the language of the lawsuits puts it all under the term "sexual assault" but only one of them so far indicates an actual sex act (forced oral sex).

The other allegations mostly involve exposing himself, unwanted touching, a forced kiss and attempts to force women to touch his penis.

I thought the others were harassment.  I didn't look at the language used though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

One woman is accusing him of sexual assault, the others are not, from what I understand. 

If he faces a legitimate sexual assault case then he should never play football again. I don’t think that’s what this is. Seems too opportunistic. 
 

The only think we know for sure is that Deshaun apparently likes happy endings. I could be wrong but I doubt Deshaun is soliciting sex from masseuses via Instagram. My hunch is that he had some prior information that he could receive a happy ending from some of these women. That poo works on a referral basis. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That albatross still hung around our neck. We paid 20 million in dead cap for a second round pick and lost cmc. Paid 16 million in dead cap for moore to be traded to Chicago   Owed burns nothing but wouldn't trade him for 2 first round picks. Shitterer was beyond the most incompetent gm I've ever seen.
    • I did a lot of research on Xavier Legette for the past few weeks, and as some of you know, I was in favor of making him our first pick. I must say that I got tired of going back and forth seemingly every other day about X, and was so ready for the draft to come in order for the team to "put up or shut up" where X was concerned, and enable discussions on X to move forward. X was (is) the most polarizing player discussed on the Huddle in terms pick 33, and that brought a lot of contentious discussion as well as information. See, you never know what to believe during the draft season, and ever since the Senior Bowl, hints and outright stories of the Panthers' and X's mutual attraction appeared and ramped up so easily, that it was almost unbelievable. So, even though I liked X, and really figured that he should be the pick, the ease of which everything fell into place and the outside noise of different analysts made me lose a little conviction. But one ex-scout developed unshakable conviction all the way through.  Dan Kelly, who used to scout for the Jets back in the day, chose Xavier Legette as the top receiver in the 2024 draft class. I came across his thoughts weeks ago, but I'm sharing them now just to give you some positive food for thought since X is indeed a Panther. There is no boom-or-bust aspect to X in Kelly's estimation, as X is reminiscent of a damned good one. "This Gamecocks receiver conjures memories of how Pro Football Hall of Fame wide receiver Art Monk — the former Washington star — ran his routes." "Legette's sudden and spontaneous moves win initial route leverage against corners and then he wins again at route breakpoints." For as critical as some have been of X's release off the line, when I look at X work, I can't say that Kelly is wrong here. X certainly seems to get open (though admittedly sometimes he just out-physicals the DBs ). "Legette is the best in this draft class at "Mossin'" defenders — that is acrobatically outjumping corners for passes and coming down with circus catches. Legette isn't the next Moss, but he is darn good. He can go deep or sell the deep route well before settling back underneath and making those vitally important chain-moving intermediate-level receptions (11-19 yards)." https://www.yardbarker.com/nfl/articles/scouts_view_the_top_receiver_in_the_nfl_draft_isnt_who_you_think/s1_13132_39987216 On Kelly's own site, First Round Mock, he was a little more specific: "Legette has this spontaneous and impulsive ability to put little moves on corners, whether releasing from the line of scrimmage...or...when going deep. Either way, it’s enough to earn Legette route leverage (position advantage against the cornerback he’s matched up against)." There's that term again: route leverage. Say what you want about X, but he knows how to get it. Lastly, within the scouting report, Kelly really mentions the term again without saying it. "Strong target who showed high-level receiving skills beyond his years...Runs routes to get open rather than well-defined routes which makes him tough to cover. Gets to the spot..." That's ironic, no? X in his roughness makes it ugly for defensive backs to cover him. For me, this was an epiphany when I was looking at some of his clips. Yeah, he may not be the technician that a Diontae Johnson or (dare I say) a Ladd McConkey is, but he always seemed to get where he needed to be. He just simply is not built to be bullied or redirected from the task at hand, and I don't think that's a characteristic or talent (if you will) that can be taught. Sure, he'll be polished up as best that the coaches can, and perhaps that will allow him a smoother release. And I'm sure that the coaches will devise ways to scheme him open, but he's built---physically and mentally to get to where he's going. You saw it last season, and you're going to see it in the pros. Watch what I'm saying. https://firstroundmock.com/2024/02/xavier-legette-reminds-former-nfl-scout-of-these-legends/
    • This is from his draft / combine profile from NFL.com.   https://www.nfl.com/prospects/austin-corbett/3200434f-5200-8097-d4cb-2bd53a7e3b55   Overview Corbett won't blow you away with any of his measurables or play traits, but he's solid in most areas. Corbett is definitely sharp enough to move inside to guard or even center and has good technique, but his average to below average play strength and lack of length may be a concern. He has the size and talent to compete for a guard/center spot early on, but he may elevate above an average starter during his career.   Sources Tell Us "He's smart and just solid all the way around. Long time starter in the league. I think he'll end up at center." - AFC offensive line coach
×
×
  • Create New...