Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Former All-Pro CB hits the market


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

We should--if one is there and their should be one---Cosmi will fall, Leatherwood, etc.  I just have no faith in this team to invest in the OL.  I think we are having a great free agency--but I question the OL moves---if they like them, they may think with Scott, Ewing, and Daley, LT is covered.  Man I hope not.

IDK I usually think like you too, but everything I have heard is our oline coaches are traveling like crazy and I believe we take multiple, but unless someone falls that we just cant pass up, I believe LT is almost a certainty in the second. A really good one should be there to develop. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Jared Patterson said:

IDK I usually think like you too, but everything I have heard is our oline coaches are traveling like crazy and I believe we take multiple, but unless someone falls that we just cant pass up, I believe LT is almost a certainty in the second. A really good one should be there to develop. 

Agreed.  Let's hope that Cam Ewing is not their answer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, MHS831 said:

We should--if one is there and their should be one---Cosmi will fall, Leatherwood, etc.  I just have no faith in this team to invest in the OL.  I think we are having a great free agency--but I question the OL moves---if they like them, they may think with Scott, Ewing, and Daley, LT is covered.  Man I hope not.

I don't like the OL signings but I would be patient.  It may have been odd being the first FA signings, but in stepping back, we're backfilling the line so that we can take BPA on the line in the draft.  Not forcing ourselves to go guard, center or tackle.  Though, left tackle is obviously preferred. 

If we stumble on a future center, Elflein takes more of a guard role, we could stumble on a new starting guard (or) two, then Elflein is the backup center, Erving becomes depth that can play LG or RG. 

Trent Scott performed pretty well so maybe he has an inside track for LT.  I just find it interesting we're looking at flexibility over a starter investment at RG or LG.

I think we're looking at something like this right now:

LT: Scott/Little/Daley

LG: Daley/Elflein/Erving

Center: Paradis/Elflein/Tecklenberg

RG: Erving/Elflein/Horton

RT: Moton/Kaskey

It ain't pretty by any means but it's a lot of new names, so, it's hard to judge. 

We are still in high need of an OT.  I would look at the draft for at least one (with LT potential) and a G/C.  It's actually quite a nice draft in the tackle class with many more than usual having the 6'4 300+, +34" arms measurables you look for.

But going back to being pessimistic: If you combine the deals for Elflein & Erving, we could've given a 15 mil guaranteed 3 yr/~25 mil type contract to a much better guard UFA.  Problem is we needed depth as much as a known commodity starter.  Maybe we still sign a guy.  Just odd we did Elflein & Erving first for how bad they've played and how injured they've been.  The rest of the FA has been money.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, davos said:

I don't like the OL signings but I would be patient.  It may have been odd being the first FA signings, but in stepping back, we're backfilling the line so that we can take BPA on the line in the draft.  Not forcing ourselves to go guard, center or tackle.  Though, left tackle is obviously preferred. 

If we stumble on a future center, Elflein takes more of a guard role, we could stumble on a new starting guard (or) two, then Elflein is the backup center, Erving becomes depth that can play LG or RG. 

Trent Scott performed pretty well so maybe he has an inside track for LT.  I just find it interesting we're looking at flexibility over a starter investment at RG or LG.

I think we're looking at something like this right now:

LT: Scott/Little/Daley

LG: Daley/Elflein/Erving

Center: Paradis/Elflein/Tecklenberg

RG: Erving/Elflein/Horton

RT: Moton/Kaskey

It ain't pretty by any means but it's a lot of new names, so, it's hard to judge. 

We are still in high need of an OT.  I would look at the draft for at least one (with LT potential) and a G/C.  It's actually quite a nice draft in the tackle class with many more than usual having the 6'4 300+, +34" arms measurables you look for.

But going back to being pessimistic: If you combine the deals for Elflein & Erving, we could've given a 15 mil guaranteed 3 yr/~25 mil type contract to a much better guard UFA.  Problem is we needed depth as much as a known commodity starter.  Maybe we still sign a guy.  Just odd we did Elflein & Erving first for how bad they've played and how injured they've been.  The rest of the FA has been money.

 

Me neither, but this is a very good OL draft.  I am thinking they will draft some rookies and these are the vets that they will compete with.  Note these veteran signings (2) play all 5 positions between them.  They will probably start in the short term...and I agree with every word you write.

Not the strategy I would have gone with.  I found it odd that the 2 players we agree to sign on Monday--seemingly the players we targeted early--are the most suspect signing.

I love the Fox, Reddick, and Perryman signings.  I am really fond of the Moore signing--probably the best value. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, RenoCarolina said:

If our main competition for Fuller is the bronco's, how much cap do they spend on their secondary after this deal?

https://twitter.com/RapSheet/status/1372933178181222407?s=20

Well I’m assuming they’ll have more cap space available now than they had before this deal.

We can create a good chunk by doing the same thing with Moton. 

The Panthers have a ton of available cap space to work from if they really want to

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Another potential option...

I'd have to see his contract, but it's hard to imagine he's making as much as Kyle Fuller was.

Wonder what they'd ask for in a trade.  if we aren't pooling assets to acquire a big name QB anymore, could be a viable target.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mav1234 said:

Wonder what they'd ask for in a trade.  if we aren't pooling assets to acquire a big name QB anymore, could be a viable target.

Heck, two or three different trades have gone down this year with just a swap of picks.

Not sure we could get something like that in this case. Don't really know that much about him or why he's seeking a trade.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nothing wrong with starting to look for bodies early. It's a long injury filled season. I doubt we get through unscathed. 
    • We're in alignment regarding Thielen not being a game changer/breaker for the Panthers. Getting the ball into hands of playmakers like TMac and XL is going to open up things more than it is getting it to Thielen underneath (or letting him go after 50/50 balls 20yds downfield in his mid-30s). However, in a room where the other guys are two second year guys and two rookies, having a reliable vet that they can learn from is just as important as it is for the QB to have as a reliable third option. I can see that being worth $8.5M (just 3%) of the $279.2M cap... especially when looking at what's left out there: https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/free-agents/_/position/wr However, the idea that the team is forcing production to Thielen and leading to losses isn't supported by the data. Targets, not receiving yards, are how you can tell if a player is being "force fed." In the two games mentioned, let's look at the other players available... vs. TB 10 targets - Adam Thielen 9 targets - David Moore 8 targets - Tommy Tremble, Xavier Legette 3 targets - Jonathon Brooks 1 target - Dan Chisena, Feleipe Franks, Stephen Sullivan vs. PHI 11 targets - Adam Thielen 8 targets - Xavier Legette 5 targets - Chuba Hubbard, David Moore 2 targets - Tommy Tremble 1 target - Ja'Tavion Sanders, Deven Thompkins There isn't exactly a bounty of other names to throw the ball to. In those games, AT was one of the top 2 WRs. Diontae had been gone by that point.   So... yea. Agreed that Thielen isn't exactly carrying the team in his mid-30s, but it's undeniable that he was the most reliable target last season that still has quite a bit of value this season. Whether or not that value is reflected in a manner folks think on the contract is going to come down to personal taste. However, the idea that the team was forcing production to AT and that was the reason behind some losses couldn't be further from the truth.
    • I would also add that I think it's more than money.  AT has looked absolutely miserable out there at times, and there was a lot of speculation he would demand to be traded.  Personally, I thought he was a lock to be moved last year.  Maybe his hamstring is the only thing that prevents that from happening. The fact that he's not only willing to come back and play, but excited about it, really bodes well for Bryce.  AT is a veteran and he knows the game.  If he didn't have confidence in Bryce, I guarantee you he wouldn't be in a Panther uniform this year.  I'll take that as a positive.
×
×
  • Create New...