Go on record. Who still wants Watson?

[LegioX]

If we have to give up our entire defense...chinn, burns, brown for Watson? Hell no I don’t want him.

[ClawOn]

I'm out. The team is out. Looking forward to moving on. 

[TheRumGone]

11 minutes ago, ImaginaryKev said:

I mean if Tepper and the organization have made it known they want a QB and have been in on a few big name QBs mentioned in TRADE talks, what makes anyone think they wont TRADE up in the draft to get a guy? They offered 8 for Stafford, they might consider moving up

Those are proven commodities though but I’m not necessarily opposed to trading up if they like a prospect that much.

[ImaginaryKev]

The people I've seen on pff, ESPN, Twitter, nfl writers all seem to think Wilson or Fields both would go 1 in other years without the presence of a John Elway prospect like Lawrence, and Fields just ran a 4.41 for a QB. They pass the eye test, right now it seems like overanalysis is the issue Fields is facing (considering people are trying to say he maybe can't read defenses when his offense has nfl dudes and the routes take a while to develop) but I guess we'll seeeee

[ImaginaryKev]

1 minute ago, TheRumGone said:

Those are proven commodities though but I’m not necessarily opposed to trading up if they like a prospect that much.

Tepper feels aggressive to me

[GoPanthers123]

Back then I did say overpaying for him would be stupid and now Watson is worth so little we could swap for Teddy with any luck.

[Bronn]

8 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

If we could get Stafford talent level we'd be trading up for sure. Dude was a former #1 overall pick who has thrown for over 45k yards and nearly 300 TDs and you're implying that would be settling? LOL!

Not sure where you’re getting that I’m implying that at all.

Stafford was our first target. There are no guarantees that any of these rookies will be on his level. 
 

How many rings does Stanford have, btw?

[Baba Yaga]

I do, innocent until proven guilty 

[LinvilleGorge]

3 minutes ago, Bronn said:

Not sure where you’re getting that I’m implying that at all.

Stafford was our first target. There are no guarantees that any of these rookies will be on his level. 
 

How many rings does Stanford have, btw?

If rings are the only standard then you're implying a lot of great players weren't good enough.

[JABANOG]

Quote

 

 

[PootieNunu]

With 12 women now coming out accusing him, even if he is innocent I would wait until everything is cleared before even thinking about trading for him. Lets get the best we can out of the draft,, Fields or Lance.

[Boundary Guru]

No

[TLGPanthersFan]

I just find the timing of this crap very suspect. 

[Boundary Guru]

3 minutes ago, JABANOG said:

 

Doesn't really jive with Buzbee's press conference today. Shrugs