Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers sign TE Dan Arnold


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

He's going to have to block some.  The team isn't going to trot him on the field only in 3rd and long situations.  Grated, he's a pass cathcing TE, but even those guys have to do some dirty work now and again.

Yeah sure a little but that's not why they signed him. Check out this stat from last season

Field Position

  G REC YDS AVG LNG TD 1st 1st% 20+ 40+
Own 1-20 - by Yard Line   1 9 9 9 0 0 0 0 0
Own 21-50 - by Yard Line   12 226 18.8 59 1 10 83.3 4 1
Opp 49-20 - by Yard Line   13 185 14.2 41 0 10 76.9 4 1
Opp 19-1 - by Yard Line   5 18 3.6 8 3 4 80 0 0

 

Look at those 1st down numbers! He's a chain mover!!

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Dex said:

Best signing outside of Reddick tbh.

I liked Moore too--you have to let the Huddle comics post their ???? comments. They would turn down a date with Barbara Fialho because they have never heard of her. 

Then the analysis starts.  Very nice signing. 

Edited by MHS831
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

I liked Moore too--you have to let the Huddle comics post their ???? threads. They would turn down a date with Barbara Fialho because they have never heard of her. 

Then the analysis starts.  Very nice signing. 

Yes it is. Usually I feel like we've always just signed players because we need a player at X position. Now, I feel we are signing players because we need a player at X position that can do Y and Z. Very different mentality to me. Me likey

Edited by Panthers Rhule
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Don't forget the young TEs, Coker, Etienne, and Jimmy Horn Jr! 😮 I'm amped to see how the team develops over the course of this upcoming season.
    • She must be doing tricks on that thang for Bill 
    • No, the casual fan gets sucked into THIS^^^ kind of thinking, and it's so woefully incorrect that it's almost sad. The first is what I've said numerous times, NOTHING about non guaranteed contracts save the billionaire owners a single penny, because they still have to spend their cap floor, and the only reason teams ever don't spend the full limit, is to then roll it over into the next season to be able to spend more that year. But in the end, owners pay the same amount of money no matter what. The reverse is also the same, that the players in totality make the same amount of money as well, because in your example of Clowney not getting that money this year, it will go to another player, as the cap needs to be spent. And you say how we just cut Clowney after we gave him the 2 year contract, but everyone including Clowney's agent and himself, knew when it was signed, that it was more likely to be a 1 year contract than a 2 with how it was structured.  The 2nd year was just to be able to spread out the cap hit and he was always most likely going to end up getting traded or cut. It's why agents and players don't care about the total money in a contract, it's always and only been about the guaranteed money, as the years and overall value are meaningless, always have been, always will be.
×
×
  • Create New...