Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Report: CB AJ Bouye close to deal with Panthers


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, stbugs said:

It was actually 4 years ago. To put it in perspective, Short and Turner had 3 pro bowls after Bouye’s pro bowl. The pro bowl is basically meaningless to us 4 years later. We needed CB depth so as long as it was a cheap deal there’s no issues.

Bradberry had zero Pro Bowls but was a Pro Bowl caliber DB.  Just because he didn't make the squad doesn't mean he didn't have a good year.

Denver may not have used him to his strength.  They were just as bad as we were. 

I think the addition of Bouye is going to be great.  Granted it won't be until game three. 

I also believe Pride will be better too.  We'll have a real offseason this year and with his experience from last year Pride our CB group is starting to look promising. 

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

How are people counting on this guy? Because of how great he was in 2017? He really was. But he played in less than 50% of the games last year and not all of that was due to getting busted for PEDs. He has also been in decline the last 3 years.

If it is real cheap it's a solid long shot type of pickup, hardly a building block we can rely on at this point tho. Geez, context. The 2nd year guys are above this guy as is right now. I'm not even sure if he can beat those guys out this year to make the 53. Again, good longshot but hardly a great player anymore or someone we can rely or should at this point.  

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Waldo said:

How are people counting on this guy? Because of how great he was in 2017? He really was. But he played in less than 50% of the games last year and not all of that was due to getting busted for PEDs. He has also been in decline the last 3 years.

If it is real cheap it's a solid long shot type of pickup, hardly a building block we can rely on at this point tho. Geez, context. The 2nd year guys are above this guy as is right now. I'm not even sure if he can beat those guys out this year to make the 53. Again, good longshot but hardly a great player anymore or someone we can rely or should at this point.  

 

If he was signed cheap enough we may just be throwing a few turds at the wall to see what sticks.

  • Beer 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, saX man said:

Do not underestimate our enthusiasm in Troy Pride as an outside corner.

Bouye is patchwork but startable.

 

Did you watch the same games as me?  Pride was lost. TBH I didn't see anything that showed promise of a starting corner. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is all about taking value in the draft.  CB was the last glaring hole heading into the draft.  I had been drafting two corners in the majority of my mocks.  Now we don't have to reach for any needs.

  • Pie 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, YourLastThought said:

If he was signed cheap enough we may just be throwing a few turds at the wall to see what sticks.

That's it. See if he has any juice left.

  • Beer 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, gofightwin said:

Did you watch the same games as me?  Pride was lost. TBH I didn't see anything that showed promise of a starting corner. 

Strongly disagree. Pride looked really solid at times and had a decent mid-season stretch. Thomas-Oliver looked quite bad and there were a few notable games where the announcers kept mixing the two up. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Bradberry had zero Pro Bowls but was a Pro Bowl caliber DB.  Just because he didn't make the squad doesn't mean he didn't have a good year.

Denver may not have used him to his strength.  They were just as bad as we were. 

I think the addition of Bouye is going to be great.  Granted it won't be until game three. 

I also believe Pride will be better too.  We'll have a real offseason this year and with his experience from last year Pride our CB group is starting to look promising. 

That is a nice hope and if we signed him for vet min so he could prove that he's still got it and maybe get a long term deal (not from us I hope because at 31 that would be too much of a risk) and get us a comp pick, I'm all for it.

Also, Bouye the past three years has been average to bad. This wasn't him not getting a pro-bowl nod. In fact, based on Turner and Short continuing to get pro-bowls well after their real good seasons you'd think that Bouye might have gotten the nod in 2018 just because he was so good in 2017.

If we paid him Apple money or more, we overpaid. He didn't get a contract in two places he visited before us, so we should have gotten a deal. If we did, I'm OK with it because it can't hurt.

ETA: As you can see in this and the other thread, to many in here he's a name and they don't realize that he's declined a lot. The fact that someone mentioned a pro-bowl from 2017 and every highlight and stat shown is from 2017 shows you that people thinking it's a great signing and automatically solidifying the CB spot are just doing it based on the name recognition and not on recent play. Hopefully, like Darnold, Erving and Elflein, he can resurrect his career, but damn we are starting to pile up a bunch of "potential" with really mediocre results the past couple years.

Edited by stbugs
  • Pie 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • BELIEVE!!!

    jimmy-clausen.jpg

     

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think there's a lot of truth here, but I will say something that may not be popular. I think Cam was a good QB that had could have been great. The GM never did enough to protect his blind side, but Cam never did enough to consistently fix his weaknesses as far as inconsistent mechanics, holding on to the ball too long, and simply consistent solid decision making. I don't know how much of the blame goes to the GM and unimaginative, old school OCs and an an HC, and how much of the blame was Cam's. But, it was a combination. Hell, they even drafted twin towers to help Cam out, but then they never got him an exclamation point at LT. Cam had great moments here--piercing that skin of the elite, but he never completely punched through. And, he is running out of time to get it done. I think this season will be his last opportunity (and I am rooting for him, unless we somehow get in the way).  I say all this because Luke was truly a great MLB. His elite play and consistency was rock solid! I think Luke was a greater LB than Cam has been a QB. I will admit that it's more difficult to be a great QB, but I don't believe that Cam and Luke should always be necessarily linked as the the main reasons why we were semi-successful during the Rivera era. I believe that Cam was an imperfect cracked wooden crutch that also held us back in some respects, while Luke was made of strong aluminum alloy that we could always depend on to get the job done. Just an observation and attempt at an objective opinion based over a period of time. It's my take and I'm sticking to it.
    • Seeing Brandon Beane in the top 5 of GM's that are drafting makes me die inside. fug JR, Bean would have been amazing here. Sigh. 
    • I mean it's the same for any of these professional talking head analysts.  Jeremiah, Brooks etc would all fail as GMs. That's why they're talking heads rather than in actual Front Offices.
×
×
  • Create New...