Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Go on record: WHO DO YOU WANT!


Recommended Posts

Offensive Tackle. Penei Sewell | O.T. Oregon or Rashawn Slater | Northwestern.
 
Or trade back in the draft and select the fast rising O.T.Christian Darrisaw | Virginia Tech.
 
Link to post
Share on other sites

OT. 

Either one of them.

Don't care for another position at all, but could be consoled if both T's are gone and we take the top CB.

No thank you to TE, 3/4/5 QB, LB, or WR.

  • Pie 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

It'd be easier for me to list who I don't want because there's more that'd make me happy than unhappy the

Parsons - Not a mike in today's NFL. Nore Anthony Barr than anything close to resembling Luke. Just as middling in coverage as Shaq is and takes himself out of the play way too often for me to feel safe taking him at 8. Has tremendous upside, i just think drafting him would be a square peg in a round hole type of deal. 

Caleb Farley - Easily CB3 behind Horn and Surtain. Reminds me of DJax where he's an athlete playing DB and his athleticism bails him out. Also good upside, i just think he is extremely raw. 

Anything on the D-line/pass rush - Weak d-line class and we're actually looking good in our front 7 right now. Even if there's a possible BPA there I would pass on it.

Mac Jones - Eh? At this point with Sammy here I think their ceiling is pretty similar at this point. Much rather develop Sam since we got him than have him and Mac battle it out.

 

Anything else would be fuging gravy.

Edited by Rags
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, thefuzz said:

OT. 

Either one of them.

Don't care for another position at all, but could be consoled if both T's are gone and we take the top CB.

No thank you to TE, 3/4/5 QB, LB, or WR.

I agree with you about taking either of the top two OTs. That said, I would be happy with Pitts if he is there and the two tackles are gone.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

I agree with you about taking either of the top two OTs. That said, I would be happy with Pitts if he is there and the two tackles are gone.

Like I said in another thread, if we take a TE at 8, I'm going to need to take a break.

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, thefuzz said:

Like I said in another thread, if we take a TE at 8, I'm going to need to take a break.

I don't think he falls to eight. Odds are Sewell, Pitts, Chase, and four QBs will be gone before the Panthers pick. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...