Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Your Carolina Panther 8 player Big Board

MHS831

By MHS831,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted

So it is time to nail down your thoughts. If you would not draft a player in the top 8, do not include him--not player rankings--it is your shopping list. 

At the end, include a number where you think the talent level significantly drops.  That should be your trade back limit. If you want to add players up to that number, go for it.

 I will start:

1. QB Lawrence (if he falls to 8, he is a panther.  I stake my rep on it)

2. LT Sewell (maybe Slater is a better fit, but dang...)

3. QB Wilson (I think he is going to be good)

4. TE Pitts (more than a TE should be allowed to be)

5. QB Fields (You really can't leave him there, but you might trade back and use him as bait)

6. LT/G Slater (Spidey Senses tingling that this might be the pick)

7. WR Chase (Really good at getting open, catching the ball, and taking it to the house)

8. WR Waddle (he is that good, folks.  Did not watch tape until Verge said he is on the list--I could handle it.  Spidey senses tingling--I have 2 spiders)

----

I see the talent drop off around 8.  I am not sure I would trade back, unless I was assured to get one of these players.  I might take some future picks and a first rounder to move back, but not sure that I would.

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
joemac Grand Master

joemac

Posted
Posted (edited)

1. Lawrence

2. Sewell

3. Pitts

4. Wilson

5. Chase

6. Fields

7. Waddle

8. Slater

9. Surtain

10. Parsons

11. Lance

 

I think there are around 10-12 blue chip players, and the talent then goes to the second tier until about number 35 or 40.  Lots and lots of value to be had at the end of the 1st/top of the 2nd.  In this draft our 2nd rounder will be a lot like a late 1st rounder.  We are set up very very pretty to really improve in the first couple of rounds.  Take the stud, game changer at 8, then improve at a crucial position of need in the 2nd and 3rd.

Edited by joemac
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
*FreeFua* Grand Master

*FreeFua*

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

So it is time to nail down your thoughts. If you would not draft a player in the top 8, do not include him--not player rankings--it is your shopping list. 

At the end, include a number where you think the talent level significantly drops.  That should be your trade back limit. If you want to add players up to that number, go for it.

 I will start:

1. QB Lawrence (if he falls to 8, he is a panther.  I stake my rep on it)

2. LT Sewell (maybe Slater is a better fit, but dang...)

3. QB Wilson (I think he is going to be good)

4. TE Pitts (more than a TE should be allowed to be)

5. QB Fields (You really can't leave him there, but you might trade back and use him as bait)

6. LT/G Slater (Spidey Senses tingling that this might be the pick)

7. WR Chase (Really good at getting open, catching the ball, and taking it to the house)

8. WR Waddle (he is that good, folks.  Did not watch tape until Verge said he is on the list--I could handle it.  Spidey senses tingling--I have 2 spiders)

----

I see the talent drop off around 8.  I am not sure I would trade back, unless I was assured to get one of these players.  I might take some future picks and a first rounder to move back, but not sure that I would.

I agree with your 8.

I prefer 1-7 over Waddle though. I’d prefer trade back before Waddle I think. 

Chase is a true #1 like a Michael Thomas imo, doesn’t blow you away but does everything so well and has really strong hands. Waddle is that luxury playmaker like Tyreek Hill. I’d much rather have the true #1. Chase and Moore can move around.

We REALLY need San Fran to actually take Mac at 3. That would move one of these 7 guys down for us at 8. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sgt Schultz Grand Master

Sgt Schultz

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, GOAT said:

I think it's silly to include Lawrence, Wilson or Jones. The top 3 picks are locks.

I don't know that Jones is a lock (his name could become Fields for that role, but one of the two are a lock to go at #3, I think), but I laughed a little when I mentioned Lawrence and Wilson.  Six weeks ago I would have had the same reaction to Sewell, but there are at least credible possibilities he could be sitting there.  Not likely, but possible.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
  • Author
Posted
43 minutes ago, GOAT said:

I think it's silly to include Lawrence, Wilson or Jones. The top 3 picks are locks.

1. Kyle Pitts

2. Rashawn Slater

3. Justin Fields

4. Penei Sewell

5. Jamar Chase

6. Jaylen Waddle

7. Patrick Surtain

8. Jaycee Horn 

 

Is Jones a lock?  I hope so.  I am seeing Fields mocked to SF a lot. 

And this is a big board, so including all players is interesting. For example, if you rate Sewell ahead of Jones and Wilson, it gives more perspective than if you automatically put 3 QBs at 1, 2, 3.   I do not have Jones or Lance in my top 8, for example.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
  • Author
Posted
38 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

1. Lawrence

2. Fields

3. Wilson

4. Lance

5. Sewell

6. Slater

7. Pitts

8. Chase

You have faith in Fields, and I see why---I can't get past the Ohio St curse that goes back to Art Schichter or whatever his name was.   He is definitely a stud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basbear
      2026 Mock Drafts

      By Basbear · Posted

      You found out what I said months ago. Its sort of simple, if Panthers/you want a edge....*Panthers need a starting edge that gets hurries/sacs/press/etc* You almost have to use the 1st on edge. Just the way it is, of course some .01% Panthers get lucky and a 4th rounder shocks the world and becomes a day one starter.    I hate double talk, I also feel the Panthers need a top backup ala Addison or Al Wallace. Sooooo I do feel the need to add one in mid rounds if possible. I mean Pat Jones is on the MAYBE cut list, Panthers need space, he had a back injury and had little impact on field. So....... It goes back to adding talent, Panthers need talent, young talent.  OT- In my finding Im able to land a "stud" in round 2 more than 50% of the current rating. Even in the 3-5 rounds, (duke lad) Im able to get a OT within the top ava. I normally draft two OTs with one must play LT at some point. So I feel the draft is weak, but one of the strong point and it helps panthers is the OT spot. A few of those OT in mid, some will be starters this year.    I posted this else where, but here is the best outcome for the Panthers given the mock draft finding- 1st- Edge 2nd- LT/OT 3rd- ILB 4th- BPA/safety/center/WR/OT/etc 5th- OT/edge/C/DL/TE 5th- """" 6th- QB/Punter/safety/NB/OL The draft feels weak at 80% of the spots and teams Im sure are on this thought too. This past draft feels much better and deeper against the pool There is no Mike green or Nic scro in the late 2nd. There is no Evans sitting there in late 5th. There is not even a Prince level edge in the 3rd by my finding. I feel Panthers for sure new to draft 2 OTs and I high believe drafting 2 edges, one must be a 1st tho. Then the remaining 3 picks one late on QB, one on ILB, and the last one BPA. Honestly the FA looks bad too, the huge problem is the amount of needed for Panthers and there's not enough cap space or draft picks to fill even half the issue this season. Its goes back to just add the best talented players possible, *so long they do not play OG, strong safety, Dbrowns spot, and Tmacs spot. Add talent everywhere else, cause its lacking.......Even CB with horn struggling and Mike Jack on a one year deal, Thor coming off injury. There room for a mid or even 2nd rounder being(ewwww) use at CB. I prefer what I posted above. Happy drafting 45!!  
    • ClawOn
      Panthers re-sign one of their UFA

      By ClawOn · Posted

      Yes.  We actually had a coach we paid millions to who burned a 6th for a long snapper strictly for the lulz.
    • Panthering
      Dolphins releasing Tyreek Hill

      By Panthering · Posted

      A complete and total cancer to the locker room 
×
×
  • Create New...