Are You Really Against Fields or Lance if they fall to #8...

[FattyFatFat]

All about Fields

 

Lance absolutely not 

[Mol3m4n]

On 4/16/2021 at 9:11 AM, t96 said:

Is Wilson really a given at #2? Everyone assumes it but I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if it's Fields. Many still think he's the clear #2 behind Lawrence, despite Wilson being the talk of the town more recently. Jets could have their cards very close to their chest and be targeting Fields. Lawrence is the only pick that is 100% set in stone.

Fields was #2 QB right after the end of the college season. I put more stock in that. 

[BurnNChinn]

 

[mrcompletely11]

Physical ability or not.  Mac Jones is just a smarter qb than fields.  And certainly not the long term project as lance.  

[bandu]

i think you strike while the iron is hot if one of the QBs falls to #8 because Darnold is to big of an unknown at this point ?.that also makes Darnold compete or let's say pushes him in camp in order to win the starting job instead of basically being unopposed. Then moreover on top of that if they both look good in camp even better especially if you draft Trey Lance who has the most potential. 

[Shocker]

13 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Physical ability or not.  Mac Jones is just a smarter qb than fields. 

I don't see that at all

Edited April 18, 2021 by Shocker

[ForJimmy]

36 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Physical ability or not.  Mac Jones is just a smarter qb than fields.  And certainly not the long term project as lance.  

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nbcsports.com/bayarea/49ers/justin-fields-did-insanely-well-aptitude-test-mark-sanchez-says%3famp
 

I think Fields is the smarter QB.

[Peppers90 NC]

43 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Physical ability or not.  Mac Jones is just a smarter qb than fields.  And certainly not the long term project as lance.  

Oh lord, there it goes. Baseless assumptions.

[Peppers90 NC]

6 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nbcsports.com/bayarea/49ers/justin-fields-did-insanely-well-aptitude-test-mark-sanchez-says%3famp
 

I think Fields is the smarter QB.

Yea people just repeating profiling assumptions. So sad.

[ForJimmy]

9 minutes ago, Peppers90 NC said:

Yea people just repeating profiling assumptions. So sad.

Yeah exactly. Can you imagine the crap Fields would be getting if he was the one who got a DUI his freshman year. “Off fields issues” would be in every draft profile of him. Mac Jones on the other hand...

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.sportscasting.com/driving-related-arrest-set-top-2021-nfl-draft-prospect-mac-jones-32-million-path-stardom/%3famp
 

“Was a turning point in his career.” It’s pretty sad. Fields was off the charts (literally) in that aptitude test for athletes. The man might have a photographic memory like Rodgers and Lebron. 
 

(this is no way hating on Mac, he was a 18 year old kid when that happened. It’s just to show you he gets different treatment.)

[rayzor]

At this point I would prefer OL throughout. I would not, however, "be against" drafting one of those two. 

[TheSpecialJuan]

 

[south-paw]

I would use Fields/Lance as trade down bait, see if anyone wants to give up a fortune for one of the QB's.  I think we will be ok at QB with Darnold.  If they are able to trade Bridgewater I would sign low cost vet to push/backup Darnold.

[Mr. Scot]