Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers likely trading back in the first


Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, trueblade said:

Think about this nightmare scenario

JAX - Lawrence
NYJ - Wilson
SF - Fields
ATL - Pitts
CIN - Sewell
MIA - Slater
DET - Lance

I'd be looking to trade down. It's good Fitts has already made some calls.

If that is the case I run to the podium and take Chase

  • Pie 5
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, trueblade said:

Think about this nightmare scenario

JAX - Lawrence
NYJ - Wilson
SF - Fields
ATL - Pitts
CIN - Sewell
MIA - Slater
DET - Lance

I'd be looking to trade down. It's good Fitts has already made some calls.

Waddle/Smith if no one will trade, but someone will want Mac Jones.

Link to post
Share on other sites

"Likely" trading down isn't mentioned at all, just that it's been explored as I'm sure it is every draft.  Aforementioned trade down to 10 would make some sense if Sewell/Slater are equal in our eyes and one will be there.  

Trading down beyond that and missing on both would be hurtful unless the compensation is overwhelming, which I can't imagine it would be. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, trueblade said:

Think about this nightmare scenario

JAX - Lawrence
NYJ - Wilson
SF - Fields
ATL - Pitts
CIN - Sewell
MIA - Slater
DET - Lance

I'd be looking to trade down. It's good Fitts has already made some calls.

Who would want to trade up? If Jones goes 3, it helps us so much. If he doesn’t, we could be looking WR because it’s highly unlikely we get a trade offer. If we take Jones at 8, that’ll suck the life out of me. 

  • Pie 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
57 minutes ago, ericr0319 said:

this confirms nothing. if Sewell or Slater is there was are stupid to trade back. UNLESS, we receive a 1st, 2nd, and 1st next year. even then we are trading away from a top talent in the draft to get more "pieces"

This is based on hindsight information. You can go team by team, like every expert does, and guess what team is going to take who. You make the best decision in the moment with the knowledge you've accumulated up to that moment...

  • Pie 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
57 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

like if sewell is there and they trade down i'm going to pull a sherman on mint street

Mint Street may go 'Sherman' tonight without any additional help...

  • Pie 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, saX man said:

It all depends on how far down and who's available at 8.  This type of thing is impossible to really know with team's keeping their boards close to the chest.

Unpopular opion but I like Eichenberg more than Darrisaw.  If we trade into the teens, there's going to be other positional talent of value as well.  I caution everyone that Seattle has always tended to take some picks that no one expected at the time (Brooks, Collier, even Clark was deemed a stretch for them in the 2nd).

Anticipate picks that we may feel are reaches that really aren't.

Chiefs do as well. Why I have a feeling they will take Eichenberg. That dude is a stud. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

unless they’re so serious that a trade goes down before draft day i wouldn’t hold my breath

and with 3 or even 4 QBs projected to go before 8 we could walk out with a top 5 prospect 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If Pitts Sewell and Slater are gone and a team wants to give us their 1st, 2nd and future first to move up from the late teens for a QB sure...

Otherwise I cant say I love this idea but I can respect the team doing due diligence and exploring all avenues.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...