Panthers likely trading back in the first

[ForJimmy]

3 minutes ago, trueblade said:

Think about this nightmare scenario

JAX - Lawrence
NYJ - Wilson
SF - Fields
ATL - Pitts
CIN - Sewell
MIA - Slater
DET - Lance

I'd be looking to trade down. It's good Fitts has already made some calls.

Waddle/Smith if no one will trade, but someone will want Mac Jones.

[CarolinaNCSU]

"Likely" trading down isn't mentioned at all, just that it's been explored as I'm sure it is every draft.  Aforementioned trade down to 10 would make some sense if Sewell/Slater are equal in our eyes and one will be there.  

Trading down beyond that and missing on both would be hurtful unless the compensation is overwhelming, which I can't imagine it would be. 

[Actionman0z]

Darrisaw at 8

[PantherPhann89]

57 minutes ago, ericr0319 said:

this confirms nothing. if Sewell or Slater is there was are stupid to trade back. UNLESS, we receive a 1st, 2nd, and 1st next year. even then we are trading away from a top talent in the draft to get more "pieces"

This is based on hindsight information. You can go team by team, like every expert does, and guess what team is going to take who. You make the best decision in the moment with the knowledge you've accumulated up to that moment...

[bythenbrs]

57 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

like if sewell is there and they trade down i'm going to pull a sherman on mint street

Mint Street may go 'Sherman' tonight without any additional help...

[bythenbrs]

11 minutes ago, Actionman0z said:

Darrisaw at 8

Feels a little early for Darrisaw but I can understand the argument...

[Missouri Cat Fan]

33 minutes ago, saX man said:

It all depends on how far down and who's available at 8.  This type of thing is impossible to really know with team's keeping their boards close to the chest.

Unpopular opion but I like Eichenberg more than Darrisaw.  If we trade into the teens, there's going to be other positional talent of value as well.  I caution everyone that Seattle has always tended to take some picks that no one expected at the time (Brooks, Collier, even Clark was deemed a stretch for them in the 2nd).

Anticipate picks that we may feel are reaches that really aren't.

Chiefs do as well. Why I have a feeling they will take Eichenberg. That dude is a stud. 

[AceBoogie]

You’ll like it until Lance and Fields set the league on fire and we’re stuck with whatever bum we try to replace Darnold with. 

[ImaginaryKev]

Hope they do. 

[frash.exe]

unless they’re so serious that a trade goes down before draft day i wouldn’t hold my breath

and with 3 or even 4 QBs projected to go before 8 we could walk out with a top 5 prospect 

[SteveSmithTD89]

If Pitts Sewell and Slater are gone and a team wants to give us their 1st, 2nd and future first to move up from the late teens for a QB sure...

Otherwise I cant say I love this idea but I can respect the team doing due diligence and exploring all avenues.

[hepcat]

Easy decision. Already got the QB position addressed. Trade back, see if maybe you can get an extra 1st next year and a few extra picks this year.

[PantherMan89]

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

Speculation that they could conceivably trade down to 10 with the Eagles but still get one of the top two tackles (if they fell)

I'd probably just go ahead and take one at 8 but I'm a cautious person.

Agreed on taking one at 8. Also, unless something changed and I missed it Philly has the 12 pick so would be going down 4 spots instead of 2. 

[RumHam]

SMOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOKE SCREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEN. Of course this franchise would fug up the possibility to get an immediate impact player.