Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is Sam Darnold a 1-Year Rental?

SizzleBuzz

By SizzleBuzz,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

woahfraze Collaborator

woahfraze

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Because if he plays well he is a free agent and we probably would have to franchise him.  A la moton.  Then once we franchise he is going to want a market deal which is going to be substantial once the cap moves up.  Picking up the option only puts us on the hook for 18ish for the last year.  So that gives us two years to figure things out.  Gives us breathing room per se.

 

What if he shows improvement but still not there yet.  Say 8 wins and improves on all his career numbers.  With no 5th year option he is going to want a 5 year deal or just play on the franchise tag.  We cannot invest 5 years on one average/above avg year.  The 5th option gives us an additional year on a "cheap" deal to evaluate

Ok, I can sort of see this middle ground. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
FuFuLamePoo Mentor

FuFuLamePoo

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Because if he plays well he is a free agent and we probably would have to franchise him.  A la moton.  Then once we franchise he is going to want a market deal which is going to be substantial once the cap moves up.  Picking up the option only puts us on the hook for 18ish for the last year.  So that gives us two years to figure things out.  Gives us breathing room per se.

 

What if he shows improvement but still not there yet.  Say 8 wins and improves on all his career numbers.  With no 5th year option he is going to want a 5 year deal or just play on the franchise tag.  We cannot invest 5 years on one average/above avg year.  The 5th option gives us an additional year on a "cheap" deal to evaluate

I guess I understand this, but I think he's going to have the chance next year to show if he's a franchise QB or not. If he explodes just go ahead and extend him for the future, I just don't think he has much time for incremental growth. This is going to be his fourth year in the league. I think this year we're going to know if he can be the guy or not.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, FuFuLamePoo said:

I guess I understand this, but I think he's going to have the chance next year to show if he's a franchise QB or not. If he explodes just go ahead and extend him for the future, I just don't think he has much time for incremental growth. This is going to be his fourth year in the league. I think this year we're going to know if he can be the guy or not.

I agree 100%.  If he looks the part get a deal done.  There should be goodwill from both camps as to not do something like Dak and wanting the moon.  One good season where everything clicks for both sides should make it easy to do a semi team friendly 5 year ext.   I think the threshold for such a deal would be making the playoffs.  And damn who knows what happens if he actually wins a game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ncfan Grand Master

ncfan

Posted
Posted

While I know it’s still possible we draft a QB.  And a Lot of speculation is that this is the reason why we haven’t picked it up yet. 
 

Think this has to do more with Teddy imo.   Honestly think they won’t pick it up until they move Teddy and clear up some $$.  Thus why it hasn’t been picked up.  I bet we cut Teddy after the draft if we can’t move him then pick up the 5th year on Darnold.

 

 

heck people are so focused on Darnold’s 5th year.  We haven’t even picked up DJ Moore’s 5th year yet either.    This Has to do more with $ and Teddy’s contract than us just potentially drafting a QB.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
Just now, ncfan said:

While I know it’s still possible we draft a QB.  And a Lot of speculation is that this is the reason why we haven’t picked it up yet. 
 

Think this has to do more with Teddy imo.   Honestly think they won’t pick it up until they move Teddy and clear up some $$.  Thus why it hasn’t been picked up.  I bet we cut Teddy after the draft if we can’t move him then pick up the 5th year on Darnold.

 

 

heck people are so focused on Darnold’s 5th year.  We haven’t even picked up DJ Moore’s 5th year yet either.    This Has to do more with $ and Teddy’s contract than us just potentially drafting a QB.

Darnolds 5th has no bearing on Teddys contract.  And there is not a chance in hades we simply cut him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Prowler2k18 Grand Master

Prowler2k18

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, ladypanther said:

They are taking liberty of Fitterer's statement  IMO.  Fitt said that there is a plan in place and they would deal with both 5th year options after the draft. I did not take that to me Darnold is on such shaky ground.

You’re right LP. It’s the New York Post...the closest thing to sensational level tabloid news there is. Doesn’t carry much weight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Michael G Mentor

Michael G

Posted
Posted

Fit did indicate that the team was committed to picking up the 5th year option. He phrased it that way on purpose, then he added another layer to the smokescreen by pointing out he team had not addressed DJ Moore's 5th year option either. I don't think its certain they pick up the option, but I do think its probable, especially if the team does not get Fields at #8. After the draft they will pick up DJ's option and probably Sam's. 

Like an earlier post explained, the team has nothing to gain by "showing their hand." I think that most of the moves they have made have led towards having more options to choose from during the draft, which, beyond picks 1 and 2 is very unpredictable. Fit wants to have multiple options depending on who is actually on the board at #8. Sam and the ? of his 5th year option is part of that plan that is in place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ncstatekwi Grand Master

ncstatekwi

Posted
Posted (edited)

Read in another article they were holding off in the event they could use Darnold as trade bait during draft...interesting..perhaps keeping all options open!  Obviously a lot of speculation...

Would be wicked crazy if they traded for Darnold to just turn him and trade him during draft.

Edited by ncstatekwi
  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
saX man Mentor

saX man

Posted
Posted

I don't think a QB after Wilson & Lawrence warranted us to aggressively trade up therefore, we targeted guys like Stafford, Watson, and eventually Darnold.

Doesn't mean we don't take on if he falls to us at #8. 

If we don't land one, I think we exersize the option.  This Thursday gon' be funnnn

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, ncstatekwi said:

Read in another article they were holding off in the event they could use Darnold as trade bait during draft...interesting..perhaps keeping all options open!  Obviously a lot of speculation...

Would be wicked crazy if they traded for Darnold to just turn him and trade him during draft.

That's not the plan. That was dumbass speculation from Florio (which even he admitted).

It's not gonna happen. The team is not that stupid.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Stumpy
      NHL 2026 Playoff Thread

      By Stumpy · Posted

      Snapped out of a Chicago playoff run, Legoman looking to click in with the big boys.
    • tukafan21
      Bryce Young 5th year option exercised

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Really? You don't see why a team can't draft a QB in the 1st round while then starting their former #1 overall pick over them while on the last year of their deal? It puts the team in a TERRIBLE place no matter how the season goes.  If Bryce sucks, you have to answer questions as to why he was still on the team to begin with, let alone starting over the rookie.  If he's good, then you run into the situation the Vikings were in last offseason with sticking with the rookie contract or the the guy who just performed instead of said young QB. It's one thing when teams keep a vet around as a bridge QB, it's something entirely different when that QB is still only in their mid 20's and was taken #1 overall by that team.   That just doesn't happen and not sure it ever has in NFL history before.
    • CanadianCat
      Where panthers draft ranked against Big Boards in 2023

      By CanadianCat · Posted

      What is the alternative? - BY, will not play for less then his perceived contract (just like Cam Newton did). So you pay him top of market as befitting a 1st round, Heisman winning, playing birthing QB would get. Or you cut him. - Then we are forced to either sign a stop gap QB / previously failed QB and try to fix him or you spend a 1st round pick and draft a guy, basically resetting the team.  The reality is that we all want a top 5 QB. The problem is there are only 5 of those guys in the world and drafting, even #1 overall doesn't guarantee that.  The other problem is the NFL market. Young QB get paid. Even an average, young QB gets top of market deals. I know a lot of people here think we could sign him to an 'average QB contract' but thats not reality. Didnt happen with Cam wont happen with BY.  So we could let this season flush out and he is again a middling QB. But then we cut and restart or accept it is what it is (including compensation) and build a team around what we have.  My money is on the latter. 
×
×
  • Create New...