Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

General Friday Draft Discussion - Rounds 2-3


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

There are 6 picks before we pick.  I feel certain that the following will be drafted before 2.7: 

Let's say they go like this

  • Jeremiah Owusu-Koromoaha LB
  • Elijiah Moore, WR
  • Trevon Moehrig S
  • Teven Jenkins OT
  • Terrance Marshall WR
  • Christian Barmore DT

If Moore, Moehrig, or Jenkins fall, I say we draft them.

We could trade back and get a T who could start, or a S, or a WR:

Sam Cosmi, T*

Walker Little, T

Liam Eichenberg, T

Landon Dickerson, C*

Wyatt Davis G*

Creed Humprey C*

Jaylen Mayfield T

Dillion Radunz T

Round 3

Spencer Brown T

Josh Meyers C

Brady Christensen T

Personally, I think we trade UP for Cosmi or Jenkins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

And we still have not tried Moton on the left side since RR left.

It appears Moton does not want to change positions and the current regime is good with that.  That's the only thing I can think of with the situation.  Now if he is wanting LT money to stay at RT then someone has to compromise.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obviously if an LT is close to BPA that's the smart pick. But what if there is a run on OTs, and Owusu is sitting there as the clear BPA? I say we grab the guy with star potential even if the positional need is less, as it's not like we are just a player or 2 away from a SB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, mrcompletely11 said:

You have to, I mean the fuse is lit now.  You cannot roll Darnold out there as things stand right now.  And I doubt a 2nd round Left tackle is going to move the needle very much at this point. 

 

Once I get over this hangover I am going to finish what I started last night in going through the top left tackles in the league and seeing where they were drafted.  So far its well over 80% in the first round.  I am not liking our chances of finding a stud at 39.  And I still think we are trading back.  fug me why didnt we go slater?  If we were going to reach might as well have been for a LT.  I truly do not understand this poo

Historical statistics really mean nothing if you aren't betting on odds. These are college players and we need a potential left tackle in the draft. If you think Rhule and Fitterer are great talent evaluators then we are good. If they suck, it doesn't matter the odds. We only need one and he can surely be the exception to the rule. Who cares as long as we get our guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jon Snow said:

It appears Moton does not want to change positions and the current regime is good with that.  That's the only thing I can think of with the situation.  Now if he is wanting LT money to stay at RT then someone has to compromise.

There really isn't much difference for top guys. You need a great left and right tackle or teams simply line up their best rusher over your weakest tackle.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, woahfraze said:

Teven Jenkins.  I know his pass pro. isn't quite on the level as his run blocking, but oooeee, he is a road-grading mauler that plays with a mean streak in the run game. I know that might "sound" like a RT and not a LT, but I don't think he's incapable of playing on the left. Also, he's got to be better than who we have currently over there.  Obviously it would be nice for the team to give Moton a shot over at LT, where many feel he could also thrive.  But I don't think the Moton or the team have interest in screwing up a good thing, and he'll stay over on the right and continue to lock it down.  

Also, having Jenkins is insurance in case they can't reach an extension agreement with Moton.  If Moton leaves and Jenkins is better suited to RT, we can slide him over.

Interesting question here - IF Jenkins and Elijah Moore are both there, will they really pass on Moore's upside plus the chance he gives you the chance to save money down the road that could be spent on Watson if his legal issues somehow become no big deal?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Trade up for a project was dumb, he's gonna be 25 next month. By the time you're deciding on whether he's worth the 5th year option or a big contract you're already gonna be thinking about moving on soon either way.  
    • I mean this is legit AF statement....you don't spend that draft capital on a project just like you don't trade up for an injured RB either, which was done in the same draft.  That draft IMO was a necessary evil for DM to learn from his mistakes (I think he did but some may not). Also I have to mention I'm a big Coker fan and think getting him as an UDFA was obv a steal.  Coker is the better WR2 at this point as Legette and its not even debatable unfortunately.  Give him year 3 but don't expect much from him.  Continue in the offseason with adding as much talent and competition on the roster as possible including WR.  Or just trade his ass for peanuts and continue to build roster by any means.......  
    • Losing him was a huge loss. Look at how the Bears went from a 5 win team to now a 11 win team. The Lions offensive line is bad this year, secondary is bad and Campbell going for it on 4th down all the time has cost them games instead of taking the Field Goals. Goff is inconsistent as well.
×
×
  • Create New...