Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

General Friday Draft Discussion - Rounds 2-3


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Hoenheim said:

If Christensen actually ends up being a Gross level LT then we can shuffle LG and RG until we find serviceable dudes I guess. Can't have all stars at every position it's not realistic 

I mean fug it, with how quickly we get the ball out, if Christensen just has to be serviceable at LT for it to work. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

How often were Armah, Thomas and Manhertz on the field?

Right now he's TE2, but already a better blocker than Arnold so I suspect he'll be in a lot on obvious running downs. Arnold is your redzone TE though. 

Tremble doesn’t have bad hands either, He is just not developed as much as a second rounder would be. He could develop into good pass catching TE if allowed to develop.
 

Not sure why folks on here would want pick Lance in the first as a developmental project but not on a third round TE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, stbugs said:

Do you really think he can be that?

Lol that's a homer take. Christensen is a nice prospect but yes old for a college guy and short arms. Inside, I think he's fine to plus guy.

 

Still think they are looking for a guy to develop as a backup in 2021, and start in 2022. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Basbear said:

Jordan, Yeboah, Mckitty, and Gray ALL where better TEs. Using a value asset to replace fuging Chris Manhentez.  Worst 3rd round pick in the draft.

Look at my avatar.

Tremble has more potential than Jordan and plays with way more fire. 

I do like Yeboah a pure receiving TE though. McKitty did jack poo at two colleges. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, stbugs said:

Lol, we need OL, that would have been a great way to stock up. No one cares what you think here. We are stating what we think. How about you bring up a better idea? You actually think that a potential starting T or G/C is less valuable that using a 3rd to replace Manhertz? Maybe you buy that Elflein and Erving are solid OL n

Are you so certain that Dan Arnold is a legitimate full-time starter? I think Tremble has a ways to go, but I think it's worthwhile to gamble on the upside.

It is clear the personnel guys don't think OL is a dire need. Christiansen, Erving, Daley, Elflein, Miller, Moton, Scott. That's 7 guys that are really likely to make the roster for 5 starting spots. How many more are they going to realistically add? Who was going to be a sure starter over the best 5 of those 7 in the 80s? 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 45catfan said:

There goes Mienerz, but hey, we got a new H-back!!!!

Dudes gonna be more than that eventually. Even just watching YouTube cut ups of all his receptions he’s got strong hands, leaps to make contested catches and some diving catches. He has a ton of talent. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • First off, my memory is faulty and so I should remember you. Anyways, welcome back. Having been around here since 2004/2005, I do have to say all these hot takes are not necessary new. I still very much remember all the constant complaints about Jake Delhomme. How he was too inaccurate, fumbled the ball too often, threw bad interceptions, and how Steve Smith deserved a better QB. How this franchise needed to replace Jake for someone better because he dragged everyone down. We even had names for Jake defenders; Blind Delhomme Jock Sniffers (BDJS). That one thread about Chris Weinke over Jake Delhomme because Weinke threw for 423 Yards but only scoring 13 points remains the worst hot takes I've ever seen around here. So to me, it feels like history repeating itself again and I don't feel like getting that much involved in flame wars like I used to. I am more of a sit back and see what the players/team does type of person. And even then, yes, there are so many moving parts that it's not as easy to pinpoint the core issues, especially when you're not inside the building and know every single detail.  And yes, I think even way back then, I hated how overvalued the QB position was and it hasn't gotten much better. It's to where my philosophy has shifted to where if you can't win a SB with a QB on their rookie contract, you might as well get another one. Otherwise, you have to give that QB so much money that the rest of the roster suffers and your window becomes quite narrow.  That's why I'm skeptical that Mahomes/Burrow/Jackson/Allen will win more than one or two SB's between them. None of them look as invisible as they did a few years ago and that's because their targets are much inferior and/or they are getting more roughed up behind a worse O-line.
    • Haha I was still off was thinking of mac jones he has done extremely well this year with basically no weopons as all the 49ers are hurt except for mcaffrey but he is playing slow this year for some reason. 
×
×
  • Create New...