Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Texans now indicate Deshaun Watson is available for trade


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

That's the same as #2. 

Not even remotely similar...#3 doesn't make any provisions for a "trade". 

 

5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Sidenote... it's weird how much you get off on the wealthy man trying to force his will on the less wealthy man.

So now we're supposed to feel sorry for a guy who is set to have career earnings approaching $200,000,000 by 2025... 🤣😂🤪🤙🍻

BTW, nobody is "forcing their will" on anyone else, stop with the virtue signaling phony talk...

...both sides agreed to a detailed and legally enforceable contract, a contract that does not contain a "my feelings are hurt clause"...

...I expect the Texans to hold him to the contract, as they should.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Not even remotely similar...#3 doesn't make any provisions for a "trade". 

 

So now we're supposed to feel sorry for a guy who is set to have career earnings approaching $200,000,000 by 2025... 🤣😂🤪🤙🍻

BTW, nobody is "forcing their will" on anyone else, stop with the virtue signaling phony talk...

...both sides agreed to a detailed and legally enforceable contract, a contract that does not contain a "my feelings are hurt clause"...

...I expect the Texans to hold him to the contract, as they should.

 

So... you're getting off on that. Just like you would if a player is released (in which case the team would be failing to uphold the contract they entered into).

Anytime you see the "strong man" winning you get off on it. It's weird.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the hypothetical Watson that existed pre-scandal was worth selling the farm for.  

the actual Watson that exists now carries too much risk to acquire IMO

I expect a payoff is coming for his current situation.  But that won't actually close the door on that chapter.  Could easily get re-opened after this group is paid off. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

Not interested. They want big compensation and no indication when or if Watson plays again. Plus the negative message it sends to the community that it's ok to violate women, allegedly, as long as you can throw a ball, that's going to be a PR nightmare. 

The more negative message (for anyone) is a sense that you can never be more than the worst thing you’ve ever done … or allegedly done in this case. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Bama Panther said:

The more negative message (for anyone) is a sense that you can never be more than the worst thing you’ve ever done … or allegedly done in this case. 

It's not 1 case. It's 22 separate unresolved cases. He could be more, a whole lot more, and he may be.  But right now, from a  business standpoint, you can't give up 3 years of number 1s and some 2s, starting caliber players, 50m in salary cap and dedicate a roster spot on the hope that this isn't true. I don't think for 1 second Watson is ignorant. Bringing in dozens of massage therapists and going as far as to fly them in, if nothing crazy is going on, record that poo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

So... you're getting off on that. Just like you would if a player is released (in which case the team would be failing to uphold the contract they entered into).

Anytime you see the "strong man" winning you get off on it. It's weird.

It’s more of a panic out of being wrong. The guy was convinced Julio wouldn’t be traded and Watson would be forced to play. Julio didn’t pan out as he wanted and now the Texans are willing to trade Watson. He is lucky Watson got into legal trouble or he would have already been traded by now. Oh yeah he also didn’t think we would unload Teddy…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

So... you're getting off on that.

Your imagination knows no bounds...

 

30 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Just like you would if a player is released (in which case the team would be failing to uphold the contract they entered into).

This would be an impossibility since NFL teams are contractually required to perform up to the terms they and the player agree to.  There is no "we're just not gonna live up to it" clause in any NFL contract.  

 

33 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Anytime you see the "strong man" winning you get off on it.

Who is the "strong man" in the Whiny Aaron vs. Packers situation?  

PS...radio is saying Whiny Aaron is set to report 😉

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I had started typing my post hours ago and didn’t finish it and just came back to finish it, posted it, then saw yours and saw we were pretty much saying the same thing - even the games that stick out to us most.  I don’t think a lot of people remember that SF playoff game, but I felt like I had just got mugged in broad daylight.  I remember them calling Mitchell for unnecessary roughness, and then I remember watching Boldin take a super late cheap shot, dead in front of the ref and then showing him watching the whole thing in replay…  the refs let them have a fuging field day and didn’t do jack poo, but if we so much as breathed the wrong way it was fuging 15 yards.  Each team playing under two completely different sets of rules.  poo hurt.  I was enraged.  I’ve never went back to watch either that game or SB50 and never will.  fuging robbery.
    • I’ve said it a million times since, but it’s impossible to keep them from affecting the game.  In SB50, they literally took the game from us, and they did it early.  Cotchery’s no-catch?  The miraculous amount of times we converted for a first down only to have it suddenly called back make it a 3rd down and 15+ against the best defense in the league that specialized in rushing the passer and man coverage on the back end?  And you do that enough times, you kill the morale and confidence of the team you’re doing it against.  It’s telling the one team “you can do whatever with impunity” and the other “you can’t do whatever they’re allowed to do.”  It changes the aggression level.  It essentially neuters one team and allows the other to do whatever the fug they want.  Imagine you call the police for help and they get there and tell you to sit still while the other party beats the poo out of you and you can’t defend yourself.  That’s what the officials do.  There is no way to avoid them affecting the game.  And more often than not, it’s the most subjective calls they use to do so.  Even in SB50…  you saw the Broncos commit more egregious penalties than anything we did, and barely any of it was called.  Their OL was holding all fuging game and the refs did nothing.  We already had our work cut out for us against two future HOF edge rushers and the refs played to their advantage with that.  From what I remember, both Oher and Remmers were called for holding at various times and their hands were in the INSIDE of the defender.  It was garbage, but all by design. Also, if there is any video of it anywhere, go look at what the refs did against us back in 2013 against SF.  The fix was in there too.  They stepped in early and often and ensured we knew we were not allowed to play with the same aggression or intensity SF was.  It was disgusting as well. at this point, I hope Vince McMahon, errr, I mean Goodell just finally scripts us to win it, because this poo is not won via competition or off merit.
    • You can go back to the New York Knicks somehow getting Patrick Ewing.  I saw a story where they place the New York Knick card in the freezer right before the drawing.  It was simple.  Show everyone the cards are undetectable to the human eye.  All they had to do was grab the coldest card. IMO ever since Goodell took over the NFL it has been fishy.  Patriots winning the SB after 9/11, New Orleans after Katrina and Peyton Manning's going away gift against us. The terrible calls during that game were blatantly one sided.  New England should have been stripped of their first 3 SB when they were caught spying on the other team in their SB wins.  I think the evidence against the Patriots was so damning Goodell felt it could ruin football and they brushed it under the table.   In the 2004 SB, How did we go from practically no yards in the first Quarter to setting a record in the 3rd Qtr.  Dan Henning changes the game plan.  IMO probably the greatest half time adjustment of all time.  
×
×
  • Create New...