Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jaycee Horn again - Improving


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

Don't get me wrong, I want Horn to be good . . . but that video . . . Horn had the leverage the entire time.  In a game, you simply don't throw that route.  Or the receiver options to an outbreaking route so the leverage works in his favor.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, BrianS said:

Don't get me wrong, I want Horn to be good . . . but that video . . . Horn had the leverage the entire time.  In a game, you simply don't throw that route.  Or the receiver options to an outbreaking route so the leverage works in his favor.

To be fair, it looks like a one on one drill.

Can't choose not to throw in a drill.

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Jaxel said:

I mean, isn't taking away the receiver option one of the primary objectives of a cb?

Of course, but holding this particular rep up as evidence that Horn is "the answer" for us outside is ludicrous.

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

To be fair, it looks like a one on one drill.

Can't choose not to throw in a drill.

Agree.  That's why I don't think this particular clip is all that exciting.  Horn lined up with the right leverage for the route.  After that, not much to see.  Had the route been outbreaking or deep, we might have had an opportunity to evaluate something.

I'm excited and hopeful that Horn turns into another Gamble / Norman / Bradberry.  I want to see something special.  Something that really shows a spark of that potential.

We'll know a whole lot more in 11 days.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, BrianS said:

Of course, but holding this particular rep up as evidence that Horn is "the answer" for us outside is ludicrous.

Agree.  That's why I don't think this particular clip is all that exciting.  Horn lined up with the right leverage for the route.  After that, not much to see.  Had the route been outbreaking or deep, we might have had an opportunity to evaluate something.

I'm excited and hopeful that Horn turns into another Gamble / Norman / Bradberry.  I want to see something special.  Something that really shows a spark of that potential.

We'll know a whole lot more in 11 days.

All indications are that Horn is going to be drastically better than Gamble, Norman, Bradberry or any other CB this team has ever had.  I think you may be setting your sights a little low.  How about the next Jalen Ramsey? 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Moo Daeng said:

Hes got a lot more potential than Norman or Bradberry for sure. Gamble is a much bettee comparison and he's still got more upside 

I would sure hope he has more upside than all of those guys - 23 years in the league between them and 2 Pro Bowls....at the #8 pick his upside better be 4-5 PB's at least and a few 1st Team All Pro's

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, BrianS said:

Of course, but holding this particular rep up as evidence that Horn is "the answer" for us outside is ludicrous.

Except he's apparently been absolutely smothering everyone he's covered so far in camp. Just like above, he's been making every receiver an ugly option for the QB.

There's been nothing in any practice to suggest he isn't "the answer" nor has there been anything to cause anyone to even doubt it.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, BrianS said:

Don't get me wrong, I want Horn to be good . . . but that video . . . Horn had the leverage the entire time.  In a game, you simply don't throw that route.  Or the receiver options to an outbreaking route so the leverage works in his favor.

 

Do we know it was 11 on 11 / 7 on 7 and not just 1 on 1?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • FLA showed everyone it’s not about superstars. they bullied the best line in the NHL into obscurity. they played hard, were in the right positions, and ran over everything that got in their way.
    • That’s really not what you said and when I even expressed doubt as to your intentions with the post you doubled down and remained unclear on whether you were trying to drag Dean Smith for whatever reason. You just got the facts wrong, which if you don’t follow the local college programs like you say then maybe you just were mistaken and thought Smith didn’t win championships or have legit superstars, and that is ok, but you just doubled down when my first post was more corrective than anything. I’m not sure what you expect posting objectively false things like “RBA has a lot of wins with nothing to show for it like Dean Smith” (paraphrasing) on a message board with plenty of UNC fans. I’m not taking it as a personal affront, we can agree to disagree, Dean Smith’s legacy fortunately will not be affected by this conversation. Screw the (Florida) Panthers?
    • Bring in the free agents and trades.  Florida is the best team and unless Tulsky makes it happen, it’s more of the same…which isn’t bad…but it’s time to win a goddamn cup. 
×
×
  • Create New...