Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers are trading LB Denzel Perryman to the Las Vegas Raiders


AndrewLaskoski
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

There is a rumor that the Cowboys are looking to part ways with Smith.

Honestly though, if we were trading with the Cowboys, I'd rather go for Connor McGovern.

Are we talking about Jaylon Smith?  I thought he was a good player for them.  What happened?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ricky Spanish said:

So it finally starts at 9:30 and he says "The Panthers have traded Denzel Washington to the Raiders for a 6th and 7th Round Pick"... Then complains it makes Fitt look like he's only looking forward to next season and given up this year. 

So I can't take him too seriously. 

Yeah especially since we have Rhule on tape screaming at the kids at the senior bowl telling them he wants players who will challenge him and not just say "yes sir". 

Even if it is true, I bet that its a butthurt player from the Rivera era who misses the days camp being a vacation and the team not being in playing shape until mid-October.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, OceanPanther said:

When you get a 7th,,  I'm like a kid in a penny candy store with a nickel  figuring out how to spend it a year in advance.
I'm gonna spend mine on a  kicker.   Next year that is..  we apparently don't need one this year.  

What if  Fitterer actually uses this 7th  to get a trade for a kicker ( someone no one wanted anymore )  next week.   How sweet would that be 

Edited by OceanPanther
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, joemac said:

Are we talking about Jaylon Smith?  I thought he was a good player for them.  What happened?

From what I've read, he was good under the system they were running when he was drafted but hasn't fared well under defensive changes.

They hoped he'd be back to form under Dan Quinn but apparently it's not working out.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Yep, glad we got something for him. I hope we get more depth so that we don’t have to sign injured or ineffective players like Perryman, Elflein and Erving in the future. It sucks that we wasted $2M on nothing, but I think Fitterer was kind of stuck because we didn’t have enough serviceable OL and LB. Yes, Carter took the job and hopefully BC and Brown work out, but there was 0 guarantee and BC/Brown haven’t played #1 DL yet. Unless we wanted to risk Darnold getting killed or our D having a big hole, we had to throw out some money.

We definitely have a hole smack dab in the middle of our run defense (literally), but I doubt Perryman was that guy. Fingers crossed someone drops to us via waivers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

From what I've read, he was good under the system they were running when he was drafted but hasn't fared well under defensive changes.

They hoped he'd be back to form under Dan Quinn but apparently it's not working out.

Damn.  Unless there is something physically wrong with him, I would DEFINITELY think about taking a flyer on him if the Cowboys cut him or want to trade him.  Just a year or 2 ago he was flying all around the field making plays for them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, TheRumGone said:

These guys are clowns. All that drama for a guy who practiced like twice and got beat out of a starting role. There are much better reasons to question rhule and fitterers moves. This isn’t one of them.

I hate sounding like a broken record but all anybody who covers this team on social media or radio does is complain and create drama about everything.  It's easer to do that for a reaction than provide useful info.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...