Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Horrible to say, but I love watching the punt team!


cardiackat88.
 Share

Recommended Posts

I mean its better to have a really good punter than a really shitty one lol so yea nothing wrong with that. If we can never have gunners worth a fart may as well have a punter punt it to the roof so anyone can get down there. (and yes I do know our STs have greatly improved since the auto derp days and penalty on literally ever STs snap)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, mcsmoak said:

I wish I could bump all the threads from the preseason last year calling for Charlton to be cut because he shanked one in practice

I don't believe anyone took the time to start any because after that shank it was just an expectation that he was just camp fodder. 

He turned it around fairly quickly though and has been a damned good kicker ever since.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I remember the early reports when we brought him in last year about him shanking one in the parking lot, but he has been lights out.  He is 10x better than Palardy ever was.  Big leg, and just has a perfect feel for way to place them...  the way he got that punt to check up perfectly at the 1.  The dude is a 100% certified UNIT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, GamecockSmitty4 said:

Mr/Ms 07579394, ever heard of outkicking your coverage? There is an optimal height:distance ratio for a punt to ensure a minimal return. Net punt yards is more important than gross punt yards. 

Come on,i knew Ravens' Sam Koch a bit,don't tell me about net yards.

Charlton's problem is the ballistic,not only high balls,but also long flat balls which can hit the boundary

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'd hold on to Walker - we have no OT depth at all. Freeling is a block of clay - all the tools are there and he appears to have a great attitude. He needs serious work on his technique to realise his potential though.
    • From my watch last night: They weren't trading out of 19 unless it was a daft offer once Freeling got there. They were clearly antsy to get Hunter - and Minnesota actually called to offer the trade down. They weren't trading out of the third round pick once Brazzell fell to it (and Canales would have been happy with him in the second round). They traded back a lot on Day 3 - even if Morgan 'Babe Ruth'd' it with Lee, Hecht and Wheatley; they clearly weren't the only guys they would have taken at those picks. I'm curious to know which player caused the reaction at the start of day 2 (Dan Morgan): "of course they'd pick him"
    • Watching this confirms that this staff and front office is super high on Monroe Freeling. I wouldn't be surprised if he's gotta a real chance to win the starting LT job in camp. If he does, we can look to flip Rasheed Walker to a contender desperate for tackle help.   As for Ickey I still really like him and wanna extend him but based on how the staff was talking about Freeling it might be time for ickey to start taking some practice sets at guard if he wants to stay here as we are gonna have to have figure out a solution for the contracts of Lewis and Hunt.  My preferred scenario for the Oline in 2027 is Freeling-Ickey-Hech-Lewis-Moton. 
×
×
  • Create New...