Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

YOU'RE ALLOWED TO BRING BACK TWO PANTHERS IN THEIR PRIME TO THIS YEARS TEAM... WHO AND WHY?


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

Cam is the obvious answer, as his 2015 season was the best season ever by a panther. His 2015 season had him as the best player in the NFL.

The second pick is where it gets a bit tricky and hard for me. Gross would help in solidifying the line, but Luke might be the best linebacker to have ever played in this game. For me, solidifying the line is most important, so I’d give Gross the slight edge and go with him. Cam and Gross

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, AggieLean said:

Cam is the obvious answer, as his 2015 season was the best season ever by a panther. His 2015 season had him as the best player in the NFL.

The second pick is where it gets a bit tricky and hard for me. Gross would help in solidifying the line, but Luke might be the best linebacker to have ever played in this game. For me, solidifying the line is most important, so I’d give Gross the slight edge and go with him. Cam and Gross

I think this conversation gets more interesting if we exclude Cam, tbh.  Or we assume QB is already Cam, haha.  In that case, Luke seems like the next best choice... but imagine if we have the opportunity to give Prime Cam Prime Gross AND Prime Kalil ?  I feel like we would just walk all over EVERYONE, lol.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, PootieNunu said:

I was as well and I watched Jake play long before Cam. 

Jake was a career 59% completion guy, Cam was at 60% its a wash, Jake had zero in the rushing department.

Its cool you like Jake because reasons, but the reasons are not because he was better than Cam in his prime at anything.

Jake's 2003 QB rating when behind under 4 and under 2 minutes was higher than Cams in 2015.

Cam had a bad Superbowl performance Jake had an incredible one.

You can have Cam I'll take Jake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

Jake's 2003 QB rating when behind under 4 and under 2 minutes was higher than Cams in 2015.

Cam had a bad Superbowl performance Jake had an incredible one.

You can have Cam I'll take Jake.

Don't worry, we would. So would basically everyone else in the NFL given those two scenarios.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

Jake's 2003 QB rating when behind under 4 and under 2 minutes was higher than Cams in 2015.

Cam had a bad Superbowl performance Jake had an incredible one.

You can have Cam I'll take Jake.

Lol great stat, I will take Cam over Jake anytime, thanks. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

if just 2 its Luke and Cam. Forget positional needs. Cam was not really down by 4 in 2015 so save Jake's stat...Cam also never had 5 turnovers in the NFC vhampionship game so Cam > cajun bowl cut and I love Jake. My original sign up name was Jambalayah! in honor of Jake's signing but Cam and Jake are not in the same dimension. 

Edited by TANTRIC-NINJA
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
×
×
  • Create New...