Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Talk to me about the Jets. What do you know?


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, hepcat said:

I had a dream last night I was on vacation in the Bahamas and I looked at the TV behind the swim up bar and the Panthers beat the Jets 20-17. 

And so the prophecy foretold a Panther victory in a manner that does not exude confidence or help PSL sales.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Jets have trended down since ol’ butt fumble came crashing back to Earth.  They always seem to have a new GM/Coach/QB combo.  To think they are any different is to ignore all current data and go with your fee-fees.

The Panthers on the other hand are trending up.  Talented roster, young Coach, GM NOT named Hurney.  That’s progress folks.


The Jets stink, but we love to stink just like our opponents.  We love making Rookie and Back up QBs alike, look as if the name on their jersey was Montana.

Heres to not having a Got Damned Clue going into week 1!  It’s how we roll.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

what's their pass pro like? seems like the obvious question.

i'm not a fan of the "let the defense carry the game" mentality but that's a no-brainer here if you're trying to ease darnold into quarterbacking. getting him a competent W against the team that previously defined him is imperative mentally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing that worries me us they have plenty of tape of our offense and defense and what Brady and Snow like to run in certain situations. I don’t think think we know anything about their playbook except for their personnel limitations.  
 

We should still win comfortably. I think we win 24-10.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Ready 2 Win said:

I'm looking for our team to play a game. To not suck. Truth be told this is all about Darnold! 

I feel sorry for him in this game. As stated above Jets will likely try to rattle him all day with immense pressure. As the creator of this thread knows we have a shitty oline to protect him. 

 

This is where Sam's "athleticism" (aka ability to scramble/run) will be very useful.   lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, glenwo2 said:

This is where Sam's "athleticism" (aka ability to scramble/run) will be very useful.   lol.

Familiar indeed. We relied on Cam's "athleticism" too much as a reason to justify little to no O-line investment. Sam isnt half the athlete Cam was. 

Edited by Ready 2 Win
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi all, some of you may have seen me around from time to time and I wanted to ask you all a favor.  I wrote an article previewing the key matchups for Sunday's game with final score prediction and was hoping y'all could check it out.

I've been wanting to begin a career eventually in sports journalism but am doing it now whenever I can and have free time away from my full-time job.  Hoping to get better the more and more I do it and build up some sample works.

https://www.sportskeeda.com/nfl/jets-panthers-key-game-matchups-score-prediction?ref=homepage

I didn't want to create a whole new thread just for this, didn't seem right to me.  But anyways, there's the link.  I appreciate whoever checks it out and any feedback.

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Ready 2 Win said:

Familiar indeed. We relied on Cam's "athleticism" too much as a reason to justify little to no O-line investment. Sam isnt half the athlete Cam was. 

Water is Wet.

 

But at the same time, he's not a lumbering Statue like Old Man Vinny Testaverde(remember him?  😉  ) was either.

He's fast enough to make some good runs with his feet.

Just not to do it every down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.  Mock drafts 
    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
×
×
  • Create New...