Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Coaching made this game Closer then it should have been..


WOW!!
 Share

Recommended Posts

42 minutes ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

That's debatable IMO there was high pressure on Wilson for the entirety of both scoring drives he slipped a sack and made the secondary cover for 6+ seconds both times.

it was more about the offense not figuring out the jets blitzing more than the defense letting up. They stayed on that field chasing Wilson most of the game.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

That's debatable IMO there was high pressure on Wilson for the entirety of both scoring drives he slipped a sack and made the secondary cover for 6+ seconds both times.

While we kept pressure up front on it for sure looked like much softer zones on the back end. It immediately looked like our offense was in clock kill mode and our defense was trying to prevent the home run to protect a shutout instead of staying super aggressive and go for the kill. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't disagree with the punt.  I really believe the way our defense was dominating that the ball should have gotten inside the 10 or 5 yard line.  But it didn't and was fair caught at the 15.  They had a shot at Rhule right after and he looked disgusted.  

As far as the offense, we were playing the clock.  Our defense was playing lights out trying not to give them rests between series would be detrimental.  I understand it's not sexy to throw the ball 20 yards each time, but we were controlling the game.  They got lucky with the first TD pass on the scramble.  

Bottom line, we won.  A win is a win.  We won close and it's better than losing close like last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let’s not also forget it’s the coaches fault Ricci is playing fullback so you could say they are in a sense responsible for the red zone fumble. I don’t understand why Tremble isn’t our fullback. He has experience at the position and is great at blocking. So why the hell does our coaching staff decide to convert a TE to FB and start him over Tremble?

Edited by rmoneyg35
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

That's debatable IMO there was high pressure on Wilson for the entirety of both scoring drives he slipped a sack and made the secondary cover for 6+ seconds both times.

Rhule himself said in the postgame conference that they stopped blitzing after a while because they trusted the front 4 to get pressure. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, rmoneyg35 said:

Let’s not also forget it’s the coaches fault Ricci is playing fullback so you could say they are in a sense responsible for the red zone fumble. I don’t understand why Tremble isn’t our fullback. He has experience at the position and is great at blocking. So why the hell does our coaching staff decide to convert a TE to FB and start him over Tremble?

Yup, not his natural position and the play looked fubar from the jump, so it probably hasn't practiced much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lots of bad takes in this thread.

They didn’t take their foot off the gas. They came out and immediately took a 15 yard shot to Robby. Robby had what looked like an option route, him and Sam read the defense differently. 

And then it comes back to not having an offensive line. Too often we have to get cute to make up for a lack of not being able to run it right at a team. Tough to constantly move the ball without a good run blocking OL. I really hope Deonte is active this Sunday. 

Like I’ve said, we are 2-3 OL pieces away from being a damn good team. If Brady and Deonte can be those guys… look out

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Shocker said:

If this staff is conservative next week on offense we will get blown out.  I am waiting to see a game where it feels like we have a coaching edge on offense.  

Exactly right

next week,  we will have a much better barometer on Rhule and his staff 

Payton is the real deal in pro football ….hate the bastard though I do….

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Darknight said:

He also said they done that because the Jets started to pick up on their blitzes the second half.

So the Jets made second half adjustments?  Wow, that's crazy.  That's odd because I thought you have a game plan and stick with it no matter what, even when it becomes ineffective.  I mean, that's the Panthers' way, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 45catfan said:

So the Jets made second half adjustments?  Wow, that's crazy.  That's odd because I thought you have a game plan and stick with it no matter what, even when it becomes ineffective.  I mean, that's the Panthers' way, right?

I want to say that this is sarcasm but since this is the huddle you can never be too sure if this is the case or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
    • You're really gonna pass up the opportunity to make a joke about skidmarks in underwear here?  Alright fine.
×
×
  • Create New...