Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Chances of beating N.O next week..


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Smithers said:

Pretty sure you’ve made several comments about us not taking Fields over Horn.  

Sorry, but you have without a doubt been overtly negative most of the time.  If you put half the effort into focusing on the positive as you do exercising your moderator power, you’d be much more tolerable.  

He is very pesimistic... but there is a lot on this message board that are like that. Just got to take it in doses. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

The Stains had an amazing 321 yards of total offense, don't get it twisted that game was more about the Packers lethargy. Also Jones-Brown are the reason 2.1 YPC against any NFL is good run D.

Right but Carolina hasn't manhandled the Saints like that in years is all I'm saying. We should have done to the Jets what they did to the Packers truthfully.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Zero percent chance if we play like we did today. I’m so sick of the Saints but that’s what you get when you have a competent coach and play caller. Either our coaching staff must make a big leap this year or Tepper needs to wipe it clean and find someone who can. Im sick of this team settling for mediocrity and being an afterthought 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Smithers said:

Pretty sure you’ve made several comments about us not taking Fields over Horn.  

Sorry, but you have without a doubt been overtly negative most of the time.  If you put half the effort into focusing on the positive as you do exercising your moderator power, you’d be much more tolerable.  

It’s a QB driven league and we had two high end prospects fall in our laps.   

you really got an issue with people thinking a team allegedly in rebuild mode should draft….a QB? 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Smithers said:

Pretty sure you’ve made several comments about us not taking Fields over Horn.  

Sorry, but you have without a doubt been overtly negative most of the time.  If you put half the effort into focusing on the positive as you do exercising your moderator power, you’d be much more tolerable.  

He wasn't always like that wayyyy back in the day on the scout forums he was even keel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Smithers said:

Pretty sure you’ve made several comments about us not taking Fields over Horn.  

Sorry, but you have without a doubt been overtly negative most of the time.  If you put half the effort into focusing on the positive as you do exercising your moderator power, you’d be much more tolerable.  

Yeah, I would've taken Fields. That doesn't mean I don't like Horn or that I don't expect him to do well.

The overall direction of the franchise hasn't been very positive lately. When it turns positive I'll get more positive.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, frankw said:

Right but Carolina hasn't manhandled the Saints like that in years is all I'm saying. We should have done to the Jets what they did to the Packers truthfully.

Exactly.  That is what worries me most is that we allowed a bottom dwelling Jets team hang around and almost mount a comeback.  What does that say about the Panthers coaching staff?

Payton is a proven commodity and the Saints have quite a bit of talent to boot.

I'm not saying the Panthers don't stand a chance, but they're gonna have to play a much better/smarter game next weekend. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was hard to tell that the Packers were playing football. LaFleur has a locker room problem IMO.

We can win. Brady needs to put his big boy hat on and call plays Payton won't be expecting. Defense needs to disguise, disguise, disguise and never play soft.  Looks like our new PR took this game to get comfortable and finally stopped hesitating. He needs to keep doing that. It'll be our entire team - coaches and players - being on the same page and outplaying evil wizard Payton for 60 minutes.

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah they were bad QBs - but QB's that stayed on their teams for several years.  BY is better than all of those. 
    • This is the right move even if you think Bryce isn't the future. Everything except signing him to a long term deal until proven otherwise. There's a decent chance we have a shot to draft a QB next year that we like. 
    • If we're still bad enough that Canales gets fired, especially if it's during the season, there is no way we could ever attract any HC worthy of the job if we told them they had to keep Bryce their first year. That would be 2 coaches he's gotten fired and 4 years of not performing up to par. I still say replace both of them next offseason.  I like Canales the man and I think he's done an absolutely outstanding job at fixing our locker room issues, as it was really bad before he showed up.  But I just don't see it from him with his in game decision making, I think he's held us back just as much as Bryce has, just in different ways. Canales was our Dan Campbell, the coach you hire to turn the franchises culture around for the HC after them to inherit and take to the next level.   The difference was he had some elite coordinators early on and really let him focus on his "leader of men" role as opposed to the X's and O's that Canales does himself and it's turned out well for him.
×
×
  • Create New...