Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

8 Saints test positive for Covid (coaches and player)


BlitzMonster
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

This game is going to be cancelled. Maybe there is some sort of movement to MNF since the team is vaccinated. 

They don't do that this year. This year's teams forfeit. The NFL is done with scheduling nightmares.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

Contact tracing homie 

Yeah, but if they don't test positive there is no issue.  Its not 18 months ago.  You don't have to quarantine for 14 days just because you've been in contact with someone who happened to test positive. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, NAS said:

I don't want any bad forfeit karma.  Hope they can play

You also don't want COVID passed from team to team. 

They bussed not only the team but the families to Jacksonville. That meant also putting them up in hotels, rentals, etc. In Florida. All of that increases the odds for positive COVID tests.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It all depends on how many coaches and (most important) players are positive for COVID.  A game can go on without coaches (or maybe with remote coaches using headsets) but if enough players are exposed, the game will get shut down.  Only the NFL knows what the number is to have a forfeit. 

The team was displaced due to the hurricane and is currently practicing in Texas.  First game in FLA.  So two COVID hotspots.  

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know where this forfeit talk is coming from BUT if it did happen, it would be both a good thing and a bad thing.

A good thing because it gives the Panthers a nice 2-0 start to the season plus it's one game less that CMC gets overused.

A bad thing because we still won't know how Sam would've improved from Week 1.   There will be constant speculation for another full week regarding that. 

 

Anyway, we'll see how the NFL handles this.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is about getting open and YAC....and the QB we have.  You basically are just highlighting average depth when targeted vs 2 players. .  And yeah, I often say AT is a small slow reliable TE in terms of what he does for us.   That's what he is.   I think a couple of you want to make this into a Renfrow argument.   I'm a Renfrow fan.  Renfrow does not check the box of what a BY O needs either at the slot.  Renfrow just a niche roleplayer at this level.  it's easy to look up how horrific AT is with the ball in his hands and in terms of getting open.....and it's also easy to look up what a low ceiling of an offense the steady AT diet produces w/ BY. 
    • The one time he's actively tried to lose was the best we've ever done.
    • I simply acknowledge BY is the QB.  And just like we did when we drafted him.....the type O you would need to setup around him for success was always pretty simple.  But we have done virtually the opposite.  XL dropping some passes isn't why we were ranked the 32nd O and 30th passing the past 2 years.  *Ricky Prohel was brought up only in regards to role function he served on the team.  Niche/specialist.   He wasn't eating up the snaps in the O.    AT should have a similar snap %. People could MAUL Ricky Prohel and put hands all over him.   We got to the Super Bowl in part because we were mauling guys (our slot CB).   You can't do that now.  AT has a MUCH easier life and still can't get open.  Or run.    If you live in 3 WR sets, with a weak armed QB, and you choose to put someone who can't get open or run in the slot.......well, your are going to have a weak pass O.  That's by design IMO.  
×
×
  • Create New...