Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Week 1 Post Script: Zach Wilson injured


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

Like I said. Very concerning that he could be the next Manziel during the pre-draft. Except you know without drama/personal issues.

Hopefully he can get his durability up, cause I did see twinges of a very decent QB when he played here with a few years of work. 

Just curious, when you say Manziel but without the drama/personal issues, what do you mean? That was the whole deal with him.

Not agreeing or disagreeing, just trying to follow your reasoning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Martin said:

Just curious, when you say Manziel but without the drama/personal issues, what do you mean? That was the whole deal with him.

Not agreeing or disagreeing, just trying to follow your reasoning.

Same injury prone figure NFL wise, probably not developed enough in college talent wise either. If he ends up on a weak team he might tank his career real early. I can see the Clausen comparatives too. He just looks like the kind of QB if a IDL landed on him(like in week one) he’d walk out with a fistful of broken ribs.

And obviously the cosmetic comparatives to both, but that was just jokes.
 

 

Edited by Harbingers
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Martin said:

Just curious, when you say Manziel but without the drama/personal issues, what do you mean? That was the whole deal with him.

Not agreeing or disagreeing, just trying to follow your reasoning.

Manziel was small framed gunslinger.  Wilson is a lot like that IMO. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
    • It is due diligence at that point. Irresponsible not to take him.  Crossing my fingers on this one, he has everything you look for except experience.  
×
×
  • Create New...