Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Offensive line is abysmal.


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

30 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

The GM and Coach drafted them, right ?

you mean, they didn’t think they were good enough to play knowing it’s a 17 game season and injuries happen

…and then seeing them in training camp,  continue to keep them on the roster 

there are  53 spots on a Nfl roster.  If a player makes the cut. That player should be able to play the position 

pro football, not college or high school 

Being drafted to play and playing better than the guy in front of you is different. The Huddle calling for Christensen and Brown to play ahead of the current starters is dumb as if they have better insight than the position coaches who evaluate these players on a daily basis. 

Coaches will put the best 11 guys on the field all the time. If these rookie O-line are that good, they would have beat out the current guys during training camp. 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, CarolinaRideorDie said:

Being drafted to play and playing better than the guy in front of you is different. The Huddle calling for Christensen and Brown to play ahead of the current starters is dumb as if they have better insight than the position coaches who evaluate these players on a daily basis. 

Coaches will put the best 11 guys on the field all the time. If these rookie O-line are that good, they would have beat out the current guys during training camp. 

No.

Dumb is putting the same, under performing veterans in the trenches week after week and expecting a different performance result 

Dumb is dumpster diving for some of the worst ranked OLmen in the league   There were other options 

Dumb is drafting players that you can’t insert when performance or injuries dictate 

there are 52 players in Nfl rosters.  If they make the roster, odds are at some point,  they are going to need to perform   This isnt Alabama with 70 players 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Scott12345 said:

 

Paradis is just killing us…he gets knocked backwards every single play…center is such a key…our guards are awful too, but with a decent center they would be better

the book is out on us…pressure up the middle 

and of course those two on the left side…

This I keep hearing we should of drafted this guard, we should of drafted this tackle, none of that matters if your Center is getting bull rushed into your quarterback chest every play. 

Teams are killing on stunts up the middle of the line. Gregory went through Paradis block on one play as if he was one of the ghost Sam use to see on the field.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Pantherxtreme said:

This I keep hearing we should of drafted this guard, we should of drafted this tackle, none of that matters if your Center is getting bull rushed into your quarterback chest every play. 

Teams are killing on stunts up the middle of the line. Gregory went through Paradis block on one play as if he was one of the ghost Sam use to see on the field.

Except THAT ghost hits hard.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nobody is saying we don't need it, just that we have bigger needs elsewhere, and that type of WR is actually something that is often found in the mid rounds, you just have to scout and evaluate properly. Here's another way of looking at why WR in the 1st shouldn't even be considered an option. Looking only at players currently on the team, what position group would you feel strongest about 4 years from now? I'm not sure there is a better answer there than WR, as you have to think T-Mac is our best player on the team in 4 years, with Coker not far behind. Our OL is too old to be considered, my opinions on Bryce is well known, Hubbard will be done by then and the rest of the RB is an unknown, Off-ball LB is maybe our biggest need, we only have 1 legit safety, it's certainly not TE, and our 2nd best CB right now will be 33 by then.   Brown should still be a beast as he'll only be 31, but nobody else on the DL projects to be that good in 4 years.  Edge rusher with Phillips, Scourton, and Princely is probably the only other possible answer than WR. So yes, that fast/shifty type of WR is 100% a need of ours, but we have so many other bigger needs both in the immediate and future, that to me, taking a WR in the 1st for the 3rd year in a row and having hit on another WR in the same time frame, just makes zero sense both currently and looking into the future.
    • Laughing at Slayton (Mooney or Calvin Austin III), but telling me that Coker is the next best thing since sliced bread...You laughing at Theo Johnson in reference to our guys too? LOL No one in their right mind thinks Nabers is anything but a stud (definitely top 10 if not 5 potential). You do realize that Thomas was in a new system with a furst-time coach last year (with a questionable QB to boot)? And yet still, it's possible that he eclipses even T-mac (not saying that he will). They didn't even mention Travis Hunter. In any event, we're not in the top half. Draft another legit receiver, and we will be. 
    • Absolutely, very fair assessment of the team. 
×
×
  • Create New...