Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would Cam Newton have Won This Game?


Hoenheim
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Hoenheim said:

I'm dead fuging serious man. Sub a healthy Cam for Sam and there's no way we get punked like we just did . 

Sam is regressing VERY quickly. I'm concerned . Teddy was doing better at this point last year. 

Not even slightly trolling. I'm dead serious!

No.

Remember the entire time he was here y’all bitches about him not having an OL or OC. Sams situation is literally worse on both fronts and you’re talking about would he have won.

POO

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, AceBoogie said:

Cam would have won a lot of games both here and in NE this year. The truth is both franchises could use him. Sadly Cam doesn’t know how to get out of his own way and really isn’t worth discussing in that particular context. 
 

The real truth is Sam isn’t the answer never was, our future at the QB position isn’t on the roster. Still doesn’t mean this team shouldn’t be expected to compete for a playoff spot. 

Dude you need to drop it, Cam's arm is hanging on by threads and he sucks now. There's a reason no team in the league wants him at this point. And it's not the vaccine, if he was as good as you say teams wouldn't care about that. It's really a shame how his career ended due to injuries but it's the reality.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...