Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rhule blames the D when asked about offensive struggles


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

If they fall on the fumble like pros we win.

Not getting that defensive score was inexcusable. 

3 interceptions and a blocked punt are inexcusable, you're right. 

An interception, a fumble, a safety and a blocked punt all in one game is dominance. Oh no, the ball slipped out of the endzone. The defense got a safety instead of a touchdown. Let's blame the defense. 

If you're relying on your defense to score the points, then you're coaching wrong. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is stupid.  He DID NOT blame the defense.

 

He very intentionally called out Sam, the offensive line, and the special teams.  

 

Very specifically called out himself and his coaching staff.

 

And then mentioned the "it's a team loss" and mentioned a few ways the defense could play better.

 

This was AFTER he spent 5 minutes talking about poor pass protection, poor running plays, and bad decisions/throws/reads by Sam.

 

  • Pie 7
  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a defensive player this would bother me. How can we win when the other team has 20 yards to the end zone. Rhule is foolish for this one. You will never win giving opposing teams short field. Defense played great imo. Alot of pressures Hurts threw the ball away alot because coverage was good and very rarely did he break contain. If we couldnt muster 3 tds thats offense problem.

 

Edited by ncsfinest21
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, bigdavis said:

I don't care what he says in a presser.

But he better be raising hell in the coach's meeting room.

Our ST group is inferior, and that's mild.  Blackburn should be on notice.

I have no complaints about Snow's D -- they did their part to win the game.  Sure, if that bad snap is recovered for the TD it should have been, it's a different game.  But that ball was slippery, and it was just a bad break that it wasn't.  The D was trying to fall on it.

The elephant in the room that Rhule didn't acknowledge is his own timidity.  I only hope somebody mans up and points it out to him, or he looks in the mirror and sees his own errors in punting.

Lastly, he's got to get with his OC and plan and call a different style of play.  Passivity never gets it done in the NFL.  Go study those brass balls in Tepper's office.

.... he went into his prevent offense. ....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, jamos14 said:

I'm sure.  And I said the same thing in that thread.  They are way over blowing this.

 

I haven't seen the whole press conference, but this is how easy it is to take something out of context or frame a discussion these days. One clip with the proper inflammatory headline and people are all over it. As Facebook has proven, hate sells.

Edited by jayboogieman
Wrong words
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jayboogieman said:

I haven't seen the whole press conference, but this is how easy it is to take some out of context or frame a discussion these days. One clip with the proper inflammatory headline and people are all over it. As Facebook has proven, hate sells.

It's because most people are unintelligent imbeciles. Like a few posts above clearly didn't even watch the presser. Low IQ morons all over

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Fox007 said:

It's because most people are unintelligent imbeciles. Like a few posts above clearly didn't even watch the presser. Low IQ morons all over

It's not just low IQ people. I've seen plenty of people with high IQs get fooled too. The biggest problem is that common sense isn't common.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Kuhndog94 said:

Playing conservative and punting at midfield before the half was some Rivera poo. The defense had shut the Eagles down up to that point. 

Thats WHY he punted. It was 15-3 and the Eagles had shown nothing on offense. Why try a long field goal with a shaky kicker or attempt a 4th down with a bad OLine and give them the ball at midfield and give them a chance to score and not just let them cut into the lead but also give their offense confidence going into the second half?

if thats how it would have panned out the same people would be blaming him for not trusting his defense and taking an unnecessary risk when we had the game in control already

what the analytics dont tell you if how the flow of the game is currently going. I really didnt think at any point yesterday the game was in jeopardy until that punt got blocked and the Eagles got the ball at our 20. Im convinced if we get that punt off and the Eagles have to go 70-80 yards they probably stall somewhere around our 40 and turnover on downs like their last drive and we win the game 18-13

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think it's strange that you still can't see where I'm coming from, and I guarantee you don't have more faith in him than I do.  You're looking at him in a vacuum, not about the team around him and the likely offensive game plans this season. We're going to be a run first team with 3 receiving options better than any of the other players on past rookie 1k seasons. If you can't understand that, then it's a you problem, not a me problem. Arizona's previous basketball coach, Sean Miller, used to do something at the first team meeting of every season and I think it's soooooooooo applicable to this situation. He'd have every player right down how many minutes/points they expected to average that season and then he'd add them up.  It would show that if they all hit those numbers, we'd score like 125 points a game and need to be playing 7 guys at a time to get their minutes. That's pretty much how you guys are putting your T-Mac expectations out there, looking solely at the player and what you think he should be able to do, not how the offense will operate as a whole. Every yard one player gets is one less yard someone else can get.  It sounds like I just have more faith in Thielen, XL, and Coker this year than most everyone else.  But a big reason for that faith is because of T-Mac and how much he'll open things up for the rest of them and Bryce being the type of QB to take the open easy passes than force it to his #1. As I've said, if any one of the following happens... Thielen ends the season sub 700 yards, XL or Coker end up sub 500 yards... Then yes, I will then shift my expectations for T-Mac's rookie year to be at least 1,000 yard season. But since I have faith in those other 3 having solid seasons, it tempers my expectations yardage totals for T-Mac this year, and this year alone.  I've also clearly stated many times that I think he's going to reach 10 TDs. If T-Mac ends the season with 800 yards and 10 TDs, while Thielen gets 900-1,000 and XL/Coker each get around 600, I don't see any world where that is a failure for a rookie season for T-Mac. Because again, we're talking about expectations, not what is possible.  So given the other WR options, I can't EXPECT T-Mac to get to the 1k mark, which is a far cry from me saying I don't think he can get there. Do you really not see the difference there?  
    • I don't recall anyone seeing this coming.  I mean, two seperate things for me.  I thought BB just might not work in college football because he is old grumpy man and college is about appealing to young kids.   So yeah, that could of gone great or horrible.  Coin flip.  This isn't that convo for me.  what we are witnessing right now play out.....this was never part of the disaster possibility/path discussed lol.  Really weird stuff.  Or maybe I missed the part where UNC hires a 20 year old "girlfriend" that apparently runs the Bill operation and before the season even starts is taking over more than just Bill but influence of the entire UNC operation.  That was her getting that official statement made today.  It was her sabotaging the Hard Knocks UNC show because she somehow wasn't the star.  Seems like elder abuse lol.  Only largely kidding.  You even got Charles Barkley saying he normally doesn't talk about personal lives of his friends but he might have to check in on Bill because this ain't normal stuff lol.  Anyway, it's entertaining.  Everything is a cartoon it seems these days.   
    • I think its strange how you were claiming this guy was the second coming of Mike Evans and you can't even get behind 1k yards? I guess I have more faith in him than you
×
×
  • Create New...