Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hindsight is 20/20


unicar15
 Share

Recommended Posts

What does anyone ever hope to accomplish by asking these questions?

There's no way of knowing all the "whats" we know now (and anyone who says they did is full on delusional) and there's now way of changing it, so why fixate on it?

None of that matters. All that matters is what we do now.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 4Corners said:

Man, that greasy 7 layer burrito with extra hot sauce and sour cream really triggered an emergency code brown while I was Wal-Mart. In hind sight I probably shouldn’t have eaten it. 
 

signed,

Najeh Davenport 

Don’t get this Najeh Davenport stuff you keep posting.  What is the deal?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, unicar15 said:

If Rhule and Fitterer know that Henderson and Gilmore will be available via trade do they draft Slater instead of Horn? 
 

Then the question becomes…If you gave up a 3rd for Henderson mid-season would you have been better off giving up a pre-draft 2022 2nd and using 2021 1st on Slater? Seems like the classic conundrum of “which elite player is more valuable…OT or CB?” I think the answer is obvious. 
 

Hindsight is always 20/20 and I love Horn and think when he comes back healthy he’s going to be a pro-bowl DB. But the thought that we could have had Slater, Henderson, Gilmore is painful right now. 
 

Yikes. 

It’s not hindsight 20/20. There were some beliefs prior to the draft that Gilmore would not be back in NE. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The teams this 2nd year player (can’t really blame the years before he was drafted on him) was playing were going 100% as most do most weeks in the NFL. The whole argument is about his play during that period and how well was he actually playing. I’m with you on the winning though. Just start winning and fans will get excited. Start getting in the playoffs and winning and we won’t care how his PFF or box score stats look. 200 yards a game to 400 yards a game, start scoring and winning playoffs games and 99% of fans will buy in. 
    • Yeah, we are gonna be raw.  Wonnum, for the past 3 years, has been averaging 8 sacks a season (4 in one season when he missed half a season).  I am OK, but yes, they will be thrown to the fire.
    • I like this because it means one or both of the rookies will be thrust into a bigger role right away and we can see what they might be. I don't like this because it just makes our team that much younger and inexperienced.  You need vets to help the young guys learn, I just hope we aren't going too far in the opposite direction.  All our FA signings were guys just coming off their rookie deals too, I get why we're doing it, but having the savvy vets help in other ways too.
×
×
  • Create New...