Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Was Rhule Blaming the Defense or Acknowledging Something Else**


SetfreexX
 Share

Recommended Posts

His wording made him sound like he was blaming the defense. Problem is the defense stood on their head most of the game, forced turnovers the offense was incapable of capitalizing on, and got put in terrible field position situations. The defense had a great game all things considered. The offense was beyond terrible and if that incompetency continues someone needs to be fired. 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 3
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The actual presser, and in context, it did not sound like his message to the team and media has been "the defense is at fault," but that it was a team loss.  I think you're keying in to something important though, he has higher expectations for the D.  But we need the same investment and expectations for our O or we will squander the talent we have on D.

Acknowledging the amount we've spent on D is not blaming them exclusively when it's part of a wider set of comments though. I really think some of this is being taken too much out of context.

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, thennek said:

Actually- one could argue special teams lost the game. That blocked punt was the beginning of the end. Even with all of the offensive woes the Panthers still win without the blocked punt….

I'd go back to the play where Quez Watkins beat our depth Safety Sam Franklin for 56 yards, to me that is what gave PHI life / momentum; because they had been stifled all day, to me they just waited for Darnold to implode as the game went on as they sat on everything intermediate to short. 

Which they could do, due to their IDL - Hargrove / Cox

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

The actual presser, and in context, it did not sound like his message to the team and media has been "the defense is at fault," but that it was a team loss.  I think you're keying in to something important though, he has higher expectations for the D.  But we need the same investment and expectations for our O or we will squander the talent we have on D.

Acknowledging the amount we've spent on D is not blaming them exclusively when it's part of a wider set of comments though. I really think some of this is being taken too much out of context.

The portion I bolded I personally believe is coming, IF he sticks to his turn around track record (paraphrasing below) we are on course.

Rhule Rough Summary Of Program Rebuild Timelines:

Year 1 - Below .500 getting the base established

Year 2 - Acknowledgeable improvement, around .500 (I estimated personally 7-9 wins as I wasn't a huge fan of the Darnold move, and knew we were weak on the OL)

Year 3 - Marked improvement Bowl Game appearance, winning record. In our case a playoff appearance / 10 - 12 wins (I think that is possible with a better OL)

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't get the impression he was blaming defense or saying we lost because of the defense.  He did say when we needed 1 more stop, the defense failed even after the investments made on that side of the ball.  Period.  Take that for what it is.  That statement is not incorrect at all.

The team is built right now for the defense to carry the offense.  I think the defense did an outstanding job with the exception of a couple drives.  It's hard to get a stop on a sudden change on a 27 yard field.  Holding them to a field goal there would have been brilliant though.  That was the 3rd turnover btw (blocked punt basically is a turnover imo).  First one was held to 3 pts.  Second one resulted in a punt, so the defense did it twice already in the same game.

I think this place has a lot of people who a) like drama and b) are very angry people.

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its not hard to see that he wasn't blaming the defense. He was trying to say that its a team loss and that everyone has missed opportunities. 

But coach Rhule does come across as annoyingly passive aggressive. The way he answers questions about the team and personnel are evasive and some stuff is just a flat out lie. Attempting to be "positive about everything" means you end not being honest about anything. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The trade happened March 10th, a couple days after the combine where Young did little but show up with a lot of water weight. Even with scouting that cuts out all the interviews and private workouts or pro-days that come right after that. The Bears ended up with a good WR and the #1 pick while the Texans got a franchise QB. If the Texans wanted Young they could have jumped a spot so it smells like they knew who the Panthers' target was. They literally traded up to #3 after picking at #2. BS they wouldn't have gotten Young if they wanted him, the Bears could have traded to 2 and then down again for another haul. All the three way trade did was let Houston know what the other 2 where doing which made them think sitting tight the best option.  The rest is normal draft smokescreen. They all lie so much that when they do tell the truth it hard to believe. Hell every one was in consensus over Bryce on the Panthers and then sure as hell was not in a matter of months.  
    • Was looking for a good breakdown of the scheme that Evero runs, and found this breakdown. Thought some of you may enjoy. Not certain how many teams are implementing this stuff, but I'm not mad that we are investing in the running game (no matter how boring it may be to play Fox Ball)      
    • believed it was Tepper who spilled everything in a press conference regarding the potential 3 way trade with Houston and Chicago. IF Houston stayed or traded up to One, the Panthers were going to take whoever was available between the two. This scenario would have been better since trading up to Two wouldn't have required selling the entire farm and DJ Moore even if we still ended up with Bryce at Two. But anyways, "hindsight is 50/50" - Cam Newton
×
×
  • Create New...