Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What Vikings fans are saying


CarolinaLivin
 Share

Recommended Posts

Quote

 

Okay, time to move on from ... whatever that was against Detroit.  http://storage.proboards.com/5999358/i/4blWiMAfXcyUL3oik3bX.gif

A few things to get us started

 

Head coach Matt Rhule told reporters in his Monday press conference that he’ll know more about McCaffrey’s situation on Wednesday, but he’s “hopeful” that McCaffrey will play this week.
 
Vegas seems to have lost faith in the Panthers, who have lost two straight games following a 3-0 start. The Panthers were dismal on offense Sunday against the Eagles with Sam Darnold throwing three interceptions while averaging only 4.8 yards per attempt.

Perhaps that’s why the Panthers are only one-point favorites at home against the Vikings, per BetMGM.
 
We’re going to learn a lot about the Carolina Panthers and Minnesota Vikings this week. Both need a win, Carolina in particular, as it tries to avoid a third straight loss. The Panthers are 3-2 after falling to the Eagles, 21-18. Carolina led 15-6 late in the third quarter before giving up touchdowns on two of the Eagles’ final three possessions. Chuba Hubbard did top 100 yards on the ground, but a season-low 267 yards and three turnovers for the offense are cause for concern. The Panthers opened as one-point home favorites.

As for Minnesota, the Vikings need to be more consistent. For three weeks, the offense averaged 425 yards while its defense struggled to get stops. The defense figured it out without much explanation and has held its last two opponents under 350 yards. But now the offense has scored 26 points in two weeks. By just looking at the final statistics, it’d be hard to tell which games the Vikings won or lost this year.
 


...*govikes*

 

Quote

Who else predicts a "You take it!" "No you take it!" "Thank you, but we insist, you win" "We couldn't do that, we don't deserve to win" type of game?

Quote

I see similarities to the Browns game: Darnold might try to give away the game as much as Baker did. If McCaffrey is back, they also have 2 strong RBs. If McCaffrey is at full strength, he might be an absolute difference-maker. Panthers don't seem to have as much DL strength as the Browns but have a better overall defense. It feels like the Vikings should win based on Cousins > Darnold..but who knows.

Quote

Which ever team makes the last mistake loses.

Quote

The Vikings will win because our GM is so good.

We have to win enough for him to keep his job, so another uninspiring win this week before we start losing to the other teams on our schedule.

8-9 and a playoff birth, here we come!!!!

Quote

We are very fortunate to play against youngsters and declining vets on declining teams at QB. Will Darnold fumigate the joint to bail us out? If they get their RBs at full strength, I don't like the sound of that. We can't stop people from running.

I don't like Mike "The Dinosaur" Zimmer and Klint Kubiak's chances to right the ship on offense past the first quarter. Zimmer is sabotaging this team with "identity" BS about running and passing to CJ Ham and Tyler Conklin as much as Adam Thielen and Justin Jefferson and Klint Kubiak is a boy genius without the pesky "genius" part.

This is Browns game all over again. Lets see which team wants to give the win away the most. Going to be rabbit season/duck season all game long until somebody gets a shotgun blast to the face.

Quote

I do not think we can pull this one off we barely beat Detroit the worst team In the NFL we make all QB's look good Mr. D Is better then Goff just saying we should have stomp Detroit but didn't won with a FG.

Quote

 

Some tape from Darnold last week:
 



He has been better than he was with the Jets... but he's still a below average QB from what I've watched. With McCaffrey's health a toss-up, this is a game our defense should be able to handle. Their OL has struggled against the pass rush, and that's the one thing our defense is doing well (which is a huge surprise, after what we saw in the preseason. Does anybody remember all that hand-wringing? Pfff. Classic preseason).

 

Quote

Carolina is a different team with McCaffery. It's no coincidence the 2 losses have come without him.
If McCaffery plays Carolina are big favorites, as a big chunk of the playbook runs through him and has allowed Darnold to run more (he has 5 rushing TDs)
Without McCaffery the playbook shrinks and Carolina becomes more predictable. They were also without LB Shaq Thompson on Sunday and he makes a big difference to their defense. Will be watching the injury reports closely.

 

Edited by CarolinaLivin
  • Pie 6
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

I feel like if we had to rank “least annoying, most tolerable, rational NFL fanbase” by division the NFC North would probably be near the top of the list. Packers fans are some of the classiest fans I’ve ever encountered. 

Probably a Midwest thing. I do give them more leeway because they gave the Saints two devastating losses in the playoffs. That's no small favor.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...